< All insights & articles

Fuel costs and commuting: what employers need to know

Published on
Written by

Rising fuel prices are creating real pressure for employees across New Zealand. For employers, this is showing up in a familiar way: more requests for flexibility, increased scrutiny of travel costs, and growing sensitivity around fairness.

While the legal framework has not changed, expectations in the workplace have. The key risk is not the fuel prices themselves, but how employers respond.

Flexible working: process matters more than outcome

Employees have a right to request flexible working under the Employment Relations Act 2000. They do not have a right to have those requests approved.

For employers, the focus should be on getting the process right:

  • consider each request genuinely and in good faith
  • respond within one month
  • if declining, rely on clear and valid business reasons

The most common issue we see is not that a request is declined, but that it is declined without proper reasoning or consistency. That is where legal risk arises.

Be careful where flexibility already exists

If flexible or remote working is already built into an employment agreement or established practice, it may not be something you can simply withdraw.

Before making changes, employers should check:

  • what the employment agreement says
  • whether flexibility has become an established expectation
  • whether consultation is required

Rolling back flexibility without proper process can quickly lead to disputes.

Travel costs: time for a sense check

For roles involving regular travel, rising fuel costs may mean existing allowances are no longer fit for purpose.

Employers should consider:

  • whether employees are effectively covering business costs
  • whether reimbursement rates are still reasonable
  • whether short-term adjustments are needed

A proactive review here can prevent both legal issues and employee dissatisfaction.

Take a practical approach to attendance issues

Commuting disruptions are likely to impact punctuality, attendance, and fatigue.

A strict or inflexible response can create unnecessary risk. Instead, employers should take a reasonable and pragmatic approach, including:

  • temporary flexibility around start times
  • short-term hybrid arrangements where possible
  • adjusting expectations where disruption is genuinely outside employee control

A clear policy is your best protection

If you are seeing an increase in flexible working requests, a clear policy is essential.

At a minimum, it should:

  • set out how requests are made and assessed
  • confirm flexibility is not automatic
  • outline key considerations (operational needs, performance, health and safety)
  • establish expectations for remote work, including availability and accountability

A well-structured policy provides consistency for managers and reduces the risk of ad hoc or inconsistent decision-making.

Final thought

Rising fuel costs are not changing the fundamentals of New Zealand employment law, but they are testing how those fundamentals are applied in practice.

Employers who respond with flexibility, clear communication, and well-defined policies will be better placed to manage both legal risk and employee expectations. Those who take an overly rigid or inconsistent approach may find themselves exposed.

If your organisation is navigating these issues or considering adjustments to policies and practices, our team can support you with tailored employment law guidance.

© McVeagh Fleming 2026
This article is published for general information purposes only.  Legal content in this article is necessarily of a general nature and should not be relied upon as legal advice.  If you require specific legal advice in respect of any legal issue, you should always engage a lawyer to provide that advice.

View all Insights

Fuel costs and commuting: what employers need to know

Fuel costs and commuting: what employers need to know

Rising fuel prices are creating real pressure for employees across New Zealand. For employers, this is showing up in a familiar way: more requests for flexibility, increased scrutiny of travel costs, and growing sensitivity around fairness.

While the legal framework has not changed, expectations in the workplace have. The key risk is not the fuel prices themselves, but how employers respond.

Flexible working: process matters more than outcome

Employees have a right to request flexible working under the Employment Relations Act 2000. They do not have a right to have those requests approved.

For employers, the focus should be on getting the process right:

  • consider each request genuinely and in good faith
  • respond within one month
  • if declining, rely on clear and valid business reasons

The most common issue we see is not that a request is declined, but that it is declined without proper reasoning or consistency. That is where legal risk arises.

Be careful where flexibility already exists

If flexible or remote working is already built into an employment agreement or established practice, it may not be something you can simply withdraw.

Before making changes, employers should check:

  • what the employment agreement says
  • whether flexibility has become an established expectation
  • whether consultation is required

Rolling back flexibility without proper process can quickly lead to disputes.

Travel costs: time for a sense check

For roles involving regular travel, rising fuel costs may mean existing allowances are no longer fit for purpose.

Employers should consider:

  • whether employees are effectively covering business costs
  • whether reimbursement rates are still reasonable
  • whether short-term adjustments are needed

A proactive review here can prevent both legal issues and employee dissatisfaction.

Take a practical approach to attendance issues

Commuting disruptions are likely to impact punctuality, attendance, and fatigue.

A strict or inflexible response can create unnecessary risk. Instead, employers should take a reasonable and pragmatic approach, including:

  • temporary flexibility around start times
  • short-term hybrid arrangements where possible
  • adjusting expectations where disruption is genuinely outside employee control

A clear policy is your best protection

If you are seeing an increase in flexible working requests, a clear policy is essential.

At a minimum, it should:

  • set out how requests are made and assessed
  • confirm flexibility is not automatic
  • outline key considerations (operational needs, performance, health and safety)
  • establish expectations for remote work, including availability and accountability

A well-structured policy provides consistency for managers and reduces the risk of ad hoc or inconsistent decision-making.

Final thought

Rising fuel costs are not changing the fundamentals of New Zealand employment law, but they are testing how those fundamentals are applied in practice.

Employers who respond with flexibility, clear communication, and well-defined policies will be better placed to manage both legal risk and employee expectations. Those who take an overly rigid or inconsistent approach may find themselves exposed.

If your organisation is navigating these issues or considering adjustments to policies and practices, our team can support you with tailored employment law guidance.

Subscribe to receive updates

I would like to receive updates for:
Thank you for subscribing. Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form. Please try again.