"Unpaid Invoices - Want to Understand Your Options"

Wednesday, March 08, 2017

At one time or another, all businesses confront the unpleasant task of collecting outstanding fees for the services or products they have provided.  When a client refuses to pay an outstanding invoice, recovering the money due may turn into a drawn-out process, even when the amount owed appears un-contentious.  Engaging a solicitor to assist with the debt recovery process has the benefit of both impressing on the debtor your commitment to pursuing the debt and simplifying an otherwise frustrating process.

Typically, we recommend approaching debt recovery in the following manner:

  1. Issuing a Demand
    In the case of an individual, a simple letter demanding payment of the sum outstanding can often prompt a reluctant debtor into at least entering a dialogue regarding when payment may be expected, or why it is currently being withheld.  If the debtor is a company and the debt is not disputed, you can go a step further and issue a statutory demand to the company, indicating an intention to liquidate the company unless payment is made within 15 working days.
  2. Pursuing the Debt
    If a demand for payment is ignored, it may then be appropriate to issue proceedings against the debtor.  There are a number of avenues that can be pursued in this regard.  For instance, if the debt is less than $15,000.00 and the matter is not particularly complex, it may be worthwhile applying to the Disputes Tribunal to hear the matter, in which case you will probably not require a lawyer to represent you.  However, some clients prefer to go direct to the District Court, even if the debt is less than $15,000.00, as you are able to include solicitor costs and filing fees in the final application for judgment.
  3. Enforcing the Judgment
    Under the new District Court Rules it is relatively easy for a creditor to proceed to judgment against a debtor who has failed to respond to the proceedings issued against them.  Obtaining judgment means that the sum outstanding is theoretically due upon demand by the creditor.  However, before any steps in the debt recovery process are commenced, due consideration should always be given to whether or not you will be able to enforce your judgment.  If the debtor owns property or is earning a steady wage, there are a number of effective enforcement avenues that can be pursued with the assistance of the District Court.

Debt recovery is not always a quick process, but there are options available to businesses and individuals getting the run around from delinquent debtors.


This article is published for general information purposes only.  Legal content in this article is necessarily of a general nature and should not be relied upon as legal advice.  If you require specific legal advice in respect of any legal issue, you should always engage a lawyer to provide that advice.   

Recent Posts


Protector Rest Home Subsidies Psychological abuse Testamentary capacity Trustee Duties Property (Relationships) Act 1976 Vessel Sale and Purchase Privacy Act 1993 Trust Check Up Lease Re Estate of Campbell Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003 (CCCFA) Verbal abuse Gifting Skilled migrant Financial services Six years Tamarapa v Byerley Mortgagor Duress Due Diligence Pattern of offending Ministry Administrators duty Abuse Interest Lease Titles Trust Confidentiality Constructive trusts Business Civil union Frustration Relationship Property Landlord Health and Safety Reform Bill Acknowledgment of Debt Creating Trusts Grey Power Erceg v Erceg Mortgagee Charity begins at home Company Law Will Gifts Subsidies SMC Consumer credit contracts Trusts Bill Trust busting Maritime Law Recovery of money Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 Interpretation Act 1999 Testamentary Promises Section 182 Family Proceedings Act 1980 Contract Law Offending Part payment Asset Protection Fair share Marriage Will that do Fair Trading Act 1986 Ship Registration Financial Advisers Act 2008 Section 15A ''Best Endeavours'' Executors duty Ministry of Social Development Ilott v Mitson 2017 UKSC 17 Limitation period Commercial Law Litigation Partnership based work visa Ship's Mortgage Beneficiary Rights Vessel survey SN v MN [2017] NZCA 289 Legislation update Domestic violence Wills Body Corporate Financial services provider (FSP) Character requirements Estate Administration Terms of Trade Unfair contract terms Charity Immigration New Zealand Lump sum Undue influence Maritime Lien Property Limitation defence Commercial Property Re Estate of Feron Hawkes Bay Trustee Company Limited v Judd KiwiSaver Validity of Wills Claims against estates Blackwell v Hollings Elder Law Deceased's wishes Repayment Mortgage Valid wills Anti-money laundering (AML) Testamentary freedom Albany Office Violence Personal Economic disadvantage Zero Hour Contracts Companies Act 1993 Immigration Section 15 Domestic Violence Act 1995 Resident Visa Physical abuse Invalid wills Eviction Wills Act 2007 Section 11 Compensation Document Disclosure Visa application Wilson v Donnellan Loss of income Partner of resident Sale of Goods Murrell v Hamilton Principal Acknowledgment Insurance Limitation Act 2010 Vessel surveyor Living standards Trusts Broadbent v Ministry of Social Development Family Protection Act 1955 Directors' Duties Income Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (FMCA) Clayton case Personal Properties and Securities Act 1999 Family Trusts Seperation Commercial Wills Act 2007 Section 8 Division of Functions Case Study Shareholders' Agreement Resident Twelve years De facto Amundson v Raos Reckless Trading Employment Charities Expression of interest Tenant White v White Interpretation Act 1999 Section 29 Skilled migrant points Financial products Break up Interpretation of documents Testamentary writing Limitation Act 1950 Changes Residential Wills Act 2007 Work and Income Ship WINZ Intellectual Property Wills Act 2007 Section 14 Temper Lankow v Rose Tenants Auckland Office Protection Order