Articles

The New Draft Trusts Bill and its Suggested Disclosure Rules - How Could This Affect You?

Thursday, March 16, 2017

A new Trusts Bill has recently been released for public consultation.  This bill updates and changes various aspects of trust law.  One interesting proposed change is the rights beneficiaries have to trust information.  The most recent judicial case involving beneficiaries and trust information is Erceg v Erceg [2017] NZSC 28.  The Supreme Court did not find that there was a presumption for or against disclosure of trust documents, but that there is an "expectation that basic trust information will be disclosed to a close beneficiary who wants it".  The Supreme Court's analysis did differ from the lower Courts.  The Supreme Court listed certain factors to take into consideration when courts receive a request for disclosure.  They are:

  • the documents that are sought (eg the trust deed as opposed to trustee minutes or financial information);
  • the context for the request and the objective of the beneficiary in making the request;
  • the nature of the interests held by the beneficiary;
  • whether there are issues of personal or commercial confidentiality;
  • whether there is any practical difficulty in providing the information;
  • whether the documents sought disclose the trustee's reasons for decisions made by the trustees;
  • the likely impact on the trustee and other beneficiaries if disclosure is made;
  • the likely impact on the settlor and third parties if disclosure is made;
  • whether disclosure can be made while still protecting confidentiality;
  • whether safeguards can be imposed on the use of the trust documentation.

The Supreme Court refused to order disclosure of the trust documents, partly based on the applicant's litigious nature and likelihood of harassing other beneficiaries, as well as other factors.

The draft Trusts Bill has gone the "other way" when it comes to giving trust information to beneficiaries.  Under the proposed bill, a trustee has a positive duty to make available to a sufficient number of beneficiaries sufficient trust information to enable the terms of the trust be enforced against the trustees.  This can include a list of the assets and liabilities, accounting records and financial statements.  There is also a presumption that the trustee must notify "qualifying beneficiaries" (a beneficiary who has a reasonable likelihood of receiving trust property) or their representative of basic trust information, which includes the fact that they are a beneficiary, the name and contact details of a trustee, the occurrence of and the details of each appointment/removal/retirement of a trustee, and the right of the beneficiary to request a copy of the terms of the trust or trust information.  There is also a presumption that the trustee must, within a reasonable period of time, give the beneficiary the trust information that the beneficiary has requested.

There are factors which can be weighed against this presumption which would allow for non-disclosure.  They are:

  • the nature of the interest in the trust held by the beneficiary and the other beneficiaries of the trust;
  • the degree and extent of the beneficiary's interest in the trust and likelihood of them receiving trust property in the future;
  • whether the information is subject to personal or commercial confidentiality;
  • the expectation and intentions of the settlor at the time of the creation of the trust, the age and other circumstances of the beneficiary;
  • the age and circumstances of other beneficiaries;
  • the effect given the information on the trustees, other beneficiaries of the trust and third parties;
  • in the case of family trusts, the effect of giving the information on relationships within the family;
  • if the trust has a large number of beneficiaries or ascertainable beneficiaries, the practicality of giving information to all beneficiaries or all members of a class of beneficiaries;
  • the practicality of imposing restrictions and other safeguards on uses of information;
  • the practicality of giving some or all of the information to the beneficiaries in redacted form; or
  • if a beneficiary has requested information, the nature and context of the request.

If these new provisions are made law, the landscape of beneficiaries and trust information will be radically changed.  There will be a presumption to give trust information to the beneficiaries and it may be that the burden of proof to not give disclosure will be on the trustees.

Are you concerned about the proposed new Trusts Bill, including its new disclosure provisions?  Concerned about creating a trust or just want a trust check-up?  If you have any thoughts and concerns about trusts, feel free to contact Peter Fuscic on (09) 306 6746 (pfuscic@mcveaghfleming.co.nz) from our Auckland City Office.

 

This article is published for general information purposes only.  Legal content in this article is necessarily of a general nature and should not be relied upon as legal advice.  If you require specific legal advice in respect of any legal issue, you should always engage a lawyer to provide that advice.  

Recent Posts


Tags

Invalid wills Business Interpretation Act 1999 Charities Trustee Duties Intellectual Property Re Estate of Campbell KiwiSaver Consumer credit contracts Testamentary writing Financial products Ministry of Social Development Case Study Trust busting Will that do Document Disclosure Legislation update Ilott v Mitson 2017 UKSC 17 Ministry Changes Section 182 Family Proceedings Act 1980 Duress Skilled migrant points Residential Interpretation Act 1999 Section 29 Subsidies Section 15 Zero Hour Contracts Reckless Trading Property (Relationships) Act 1976 Deceased's wishes Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (FMCA) Sale of Goods Income Commercial Property Grey Power Wills Immigration Civil union Wilson v Donnellan Division of Functions Testamentary capacity Clayton case Gifting Albany Office Murrell v Hamilton Visa application Administrators duty Lankow v Rose Section 15A Asset Protection Valid wills Financial services Family Protection Act 1955 Executors duty Amundson v Raos Fair share Due Diligence Estate Administration Fair Trading Act 1986 Tenants Expression of interest Anti-money laundering (AML) Company Law Beneficiary Rights Employment Tenant Gifts Undue influence WINZ Testamentary freedom Financial Advisers Act 2008 Personal Properties and Securities Act 1999 Commercial Law Rest Home Subsidies Conract Law Lease Landlord Terms of Trade Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 Living standards Charity begins at home White v White Re Estate of Feron Personal Wills Act 2007 Section 14 Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003 (CCCFA) Creating Trusts Constructive trusts Resident Seperation Family Trusts Wills Act 2007 Section 8 Tamarapa v Byerley Economic disadvantage Work and Income Will Skilled migrant Marriage Eviction Blackwell v Hollings Litigation Erceg v Erceg Compensation Commercial Financial services provider (FSP) Validity of Wills Claims against estates Trusts Hawkes Bay Trustee Company Limited v Judd Testamentary Promises Broadbent v Ministry of Social Development Break up Health and Safety Reform Bill De facto Directors' Duties Wills Act 2007 Relationship Property Loss of income Privacy Act 1993 Auckland Office Wills Act 2007 Section 11 SMC Trust Check Up Immigration New Zealand Shareholders' Agreement Property Unfair contract terms Trusts Bill Body Corporate Elder Law Companies Act 1993 Interpretation of documents Lease Titles Lump sum Trust Confidentiality Charity

Archive