Are You Getting Your Fair Share of Relationship Property Upon a Break Up?

Thursday, April 06, 2017

The Property (Relationships) Act 1976 ("the Act") applies to marriages, civil unions and de facto relationships.  Generally under the Act, at the end of one of these relationships, the parties receive a 50:50 share of all the relationship property.  This usually includes the home, family chattels, and all other property acquired during the relationship.  However the Court does have the power to award a lump sum payment or order the transfer of relationship property from one party in the relationship to the other under Section 15 of the Act. Read more

Recent Posts


Executors duty Mortgagee Frustration Gifting WINZ Family Protection Act 1955 Mortgagor Repayment Abuse Commercial Document Disclosure Will that do KiwiSaver Acknowledgment Loss of income Duress Fair Trading Act 1986 Unfair contract terms Hawkes Bay Trustee Company Limited v Judd Character requirements Employment Limitation Act 2010 Wills Act 2007 Trusts Bill Subsidies Will Testamentary freedom Claims against estates Limitation Act 1950 Tenant Wills Act 2007 Section 14 Shareholders' Agreement Expression of interest Due Diligence Trust Check Up Terms of Trade Mortgage Commercial Law Lump sum Division of Functions Gifts Interpretation of documents Personal Contract Law Trust busting Charity Trust Confidentiality Anti-money laundering (AML) Charities Re Estate of Feron Ilott v Mitson 2017 UKSC 17 Rest Home Subsidies Offending Albany Office Deceased's wishes SN v MN [2017] NZCA 289 Immigration New Zealand Section 15 Immigration Legislation update Resident Visa Amundson v Raos Auckland Office Landlord Twelve years Recovery of money Body Corporate Domestic violence Physical abuse Break up Residential Company Law Re Estate of Campbell Work and Income Estate Administration Zero Hour Contracts Charity begins at home Wilson v Donnellan Resident Grey Power Directors' Duties White v White Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 Protection Order Psychological abuse Trusts Family Trusts Case Study Six years Violence Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (FMCA) Reckless Trading Partnership based work visa Compensation Asset Protection Skilled migrant Temper Wills Act 2007 Section 8 Erceg v Erceg Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003 (CCCFA) Principal Invalid wills Tenants Business Broadbent v Ministry of Social Development Constructive trusts ''Best Endeavours'' Valid wills Domestic Violence Act 1995 Financial services provider (FSP) Limitation period Limitation defence Section 182 Family Proceedings Act 1980 Fair share Murrell v Hamilton Ministry of Social Development Seperation Marriage Interest De facto Verbal abuse Lease Titles Creating Trusts Wills Civil union Property (Relationships) Act 1976 Testamentary writing Commercial Property Skilled migrant points Financial Advisers Act 2008 Wills Act 2007 Section 11 Section 15A Economic disadvantage Blackwell v Hollings Interpretation Act 1999 Section 29 Interpretation Act 1999 Consumer credit contracts Tamarapa v Byerley Litigation Financial services Undue influence Acknowledgment of Debt Sale of Goods Relationship Property Administrators duty Privacy Act 1993 Companies Act 1993 Property Protector Lankow v Rose Income Living standards Visa application SMC Part payment Pattern of offending Financial products Testamentary Promises Changes Clayton case Lease Elder Law Partner of resident Health and Safety Reform Bill Validity of Wills Testamentary capacity Trustee Duties Beneficiary Rights Eviction Personal Properties and Securities Act 1999 Ministry Intellectual Property