Are You in a De Facto Relationship?

Tuesday, May 02, 2017

It is common knowledge that when a married couple in New Zealand gets divorced, they, general speaking, get half each of all the property owned by the parties.  In New Zealand this asset division also extends to de facto relationships of more than three years, but what is a de facto relationship?  A marriage is easy to identify:  there is a wedding, someone cuts the cake, there is usually an adorable child in charge of the rings and most importantly, a legal document; a marriage certificate which says you are married.  However, de facto relationships are not so easy to identify. Read more

Are You Getting Your Fair Share of Relationship Property Upon a Break Up?

Thursday, April 06, 2017

The Property (Relationships) Act 1976 ("the Act") applies to marriages, civil unions and de facto relationships.  Generally under the Act, at the end of one of these relationships, the parties receive a 50:50 share of all the relationship property.  This usually includes the home, family chattels, and all other property acquired during the relationship.  However the Court does have the power to award a lump sum payment or order the transfer of relationship property from one party in the relationship to the other under Section 15 of the Act. Read more

The New Draft Trusts Bill and its Suggested Disclosure Rules - How Could This Affect You?

Thursday, March 16, 2017

A new Trusts Bill has recently been released for public consultation.  This bill updates and changes various aspects of trust law.  One interesting proposed change is the rights beneficiaries have to trust information.  The most recent judicial case involving beneficiaries and trust information is Erceg v Erceg [2017] NZSC 28.  The Supreme Court did not find that there was a presumption for or against disclosure of trust documents, but that there is an "expectation that basic trust information will be disclosed to a close beneficiary who wants it".  The Supreme Court's analysis did differ from the lower Courts.  The Supreme Court listed certain factors to take into consideration when courts receive a request for disclosure.  They are: Read more

Are You Entitled To Value From Your (Soon-to-Be) Ex-Spouse's or Ex-Partner's Trust?

Monday, March 13, 2017

What happens if your relationship ends and your spouse/partner has previously settled property in a trust?  If the trust is valid, and there have been no dispositions to which the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 applies, there are two ways you may make a claim against that property. Read more

Dispelling Some Of The Myths About Property Division On Separation

Thursday, August 25, 2011

Most people who have been through a separation would agree that it is a difficult and stressful time. This can be exacerbated when there is confusion or misunderstanding about what property is classed as relationship property and what property is classed as separate property. The Property (Relationships) Act 1976 (“the Act”) provides a code for how property is to be divided on separation for couples who are married, in a civil union partnership or de facto/same sex relationship.  Read more

Recent Posts


Domestic violence Property Hawkes Bay Trustee Company Limited v Judd Intellectual Property Commercial Law Broadbent v Ministry of Social Development Mortgagor Pattern of offending Invalid wills Character requirements Temper Violence Testamentary Promises Validity of Wills Employment Commercial Property Interest SN v MN [2017] NZCA 289 Lankow v Rose Anti-money laundering (AML) Lump sum Property (Relationships) Act 1976 Financial products Legislation update Wills Act 2007 Companies Act 1993 Loss of income Duress Company Law De facto Work and Income Charity begins at home Trusts Repayment Family Trusts SMC Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (FMCA) Terms of Trade Executors duty Testamentary writing Commercial Amundson v Raos Family Protection Act 1955 Partner of resident Compensation Auckland Office Wills Act 2007 Section 11 Income Deceased's wishes Zero Hour Contracts Financial services Limitation Act 1950 Asset Protection Trusts Bill Subsidies Division of Functions Acknowledgment of Debt Acknowledgment Albany Office Limitation Act 2010 Section 15A Trust busting Section 15 Limitation defence Abuse WINZ Estate Administration Beneficiary Rights Grey Power Break up Residential Health and Safety Reform Bill Psychological abuse Re Estate of Feron Charities Ministry of Social Development Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 Changes Gifts Protector Shareholders' Agreement Constructive trusts Seperation Frustration Fair Trading Act 1986 Civil union Financial services provider (FSP) Directors' Duties KiwiSaver Privacy Act 1993 Gifting Reckless Trading Creating Trusts Skilled migrant points Re Estate of Campbell Relationship Property Tamarapa v Byerley ''Best Endeavours'' Section 182 Family Proceedings Act 1980 Case Study Unfair contract terms Principal Erceg v Erceg Claims against estates Living standards Will that do Resident Skilled migrant Ilott v Mitson 2017 UKSC 17 Physical abuse Wills Act 2007 Section 8 Immigration New Zealand Trust Confidentiality Lease Fair share Document Disclosure Rest Home Subsidies Sale of Goods Interpretation Act 1999 Eviction Consumer credit contracts Valid wills Charity Landlord Litigation Due Diligence White v White Verbal abuse Protection Order Wilson v Donnellan Elder Law Domestic Violence Act 1995 Contract Law Financial Advisers Act 2008 Ministry Economic disadvantage Partnership based work visa Interpretation Act 1999 Section 29 Business Twelve years Tenants Resident Visa Testamentary freedom Limitation period Part payment Will Offending Tenant Personal Properties and Securities Act 1999 Body Corporate Recovery of money Trustee Duties Undue influence Personal Expression of interest Marriage Mortgage Testamentary capacity Clayton case Visa application Six years Blackwell v Hollings Immigration Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003 (CCCFA) Wills Trust Check Up Lease Titles Mortgagee Interpretation of documents Administrators duty Wills Act 2007 Section 14 Murrell v Hamilton