Articles

Reduced Limitation Periods Have Significant Consequences for Mortgagees

Thursday, September 07, 2017

 Read more

Residential-Care Subsidy Update - Eligibility Improved

Thursday, July 20, 2017

The High Court, in Broadbent v The Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development [2017] NZHC 1499 (a test case), has told the Ministry of Social Development that it is not correctly applying the means testing assessment for income when determining someone's eligibility for a residential-care subsidy. Read more

Commercial Leases - Things Landlords Should Consider Before Entering Into a New Lease

Friday, May 12, 2017

It is in a Landlord's best interest to protect their investment and make sure any exposure to loss from a dodgy Tenant is minimised.  All too often we hear of stories involving a Landlord being duped by a Tenant for whatever reason.  Perhaps the Tenant becomes unable to pay its rent and rather than seeking out the Landlord and dealing with the situation head on, the Tenant allows its financial problems to continue until it is too late.  By this time the Landlord is often owed money in rental and outgoings arrears and in the more extreme circumstances can be left with a vacant property needing to be re-tenanted urgently. Read more

Protecting Commercial Landlords From Tenancy Default

Friday, May 12, 2017

Unfortunately situations where Tenants are unable to pay rent on their leased commercial premises happens all too often.  As a commercial property Landlord, knowing your rights and what to do if this situation arises will help minimise your losses. Read more

House and Land Package Purchase Issues

Friday, May 12, 2017

Buying a new build "House and Land" package has become a popular option for many first home buyers.  It can involve a deposit lower than 20% of purchase price (depending on finance), and means you have the time it takes to build to keep saving towards the purchase of your new home. Read more

Are You in a De Facto Relationship?

Tuesday, May 02, 2017

It is common knowledge that when a married couple in New Zealand gets divorced, they, general speaking, get half each of all the property owned by the parties.  In New Zealand this asset division also extends to de facto relationships of more than three years, but what is a de facto relationship?  A marriage is easy to identify:  there is a wedding, someone cuts the cake, there is usually an adorable child in charge of the rings and most importantly, a legal document; a marriage certificate which says you are married.  However, de facto relationships are not so easy to identify. Read more

When Charity Does Not Begin at Home and Testamentary Freedom Triumphs

Tuesday, April 11, 2017

The truism that charity begins at home might have been given a serious knock back going by the recent UK Supreme Court decision concerning an adult daughter's claim against her mother's estate in IIott v Mitson [2017] UKSC 17.  Read more

Are You Getting Your Fair Share of Relationship Property Upon a Break Up?

Thursday, April 06, 2017

The Property (Relationships) Act 1976 ("the Act") applies to marriages, civil unions and de facto relationships.  Generally under the Act, at the end of one of these relationships, the parties receive a 50:50 share of all the relationship property.  This usually includes the home, family chattels, and all other property acquired during the relationship.  However the Court does have the power to award a lump sum payment or order the transfer of relationship property from one party in the relationship to the other under Section 15 of the Act. Read more

Will That Do? - Validation of Non-Compliant Wills

Tuesday, March 21, 2017

Before a deceased's last will can have the legal effect of distributing property to his or her heirs accordingly to its terms, it must be admitted to probate, that is accepted by the High Court as being valid. Read more

The New Draft Trusts Bill and its Suggested Disclosure Rules - How Could This Affect You?

Thursday, March 16, 2017

A new Trusts Bill has recently been released for public consultation.  This bill updates and changes various aspects of trust law.  One interesting proposed change is the rights beneficiaries have to trust information.  The most recent judicial case involving beneficiaries and trust information is Erceg v Erceg [2017] NZSC 28.  The Supreme Court did not find that there was a presumption for or against disclosure of trust documents, but that there is an "expectation that basic trust information will be disclosed to a close beneficiary who wants it".  The Supreme Court's analysis did differ from the lower Courts.  The Supreme Court listed certain factors to take into consideration when courts receive a request for disclosure.  They are: Read more

Recent Posts


Tags

Intellectual Property Charity begins at home Trusts Bill Expression of interest De facto Skilled migrant Property Residential Income Resident Hawkes Bay Trustee Company Limited v Judd Company Law Litigation Civil union Document Disclosure ''Best Endeavours'' Privacy Act 1993 Subsidies Wills Act 2007 Section 11 Limitation Act 1950 Executors duty Blackwell v Hollings Immigration Landlord Shareholders' Agreement Living standards Ministry Loss of income Lease Principal Broadbent v Ministry of Social Development Financial products Wills Act 2007 Relationship Property Re Estate of Feron Seperation Mortgagor Psychological abuse Companies Act 1993 Claims against estates Wilson v Donnellan Temper Tamarapa v Byerley Commercial Directors' Duties Wills Act 2007 Section 8 Violence Business Part payment Personal Employment Verbal abuse Lease Titles Work and Income SN v MN [2017] NZCA 289 Changes Body Corporate Validity of Wills Partner of resident SMC Financial services provider (FSP) Testamentary capacity Wills Act 2007 Section 14 Undue influence Invalid wills Tenant Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 Unfair contract terms Will that do Terms of Trade Administrators duty Charities Limitation period Break up Mortgagee Fair Trading Act 1986 Limitation defence Frustration Acknowledgment of Debt Mortgage Section 15A KiwiSaver Clayton case Commercial Property Financial services Constructive trusts Pattern of offending Estate Administration Testamentary freedom Acknowledgment Health and Safety Reform Bill Charity Murrell v Hamilton Property (Relationships) Act 1976 Albany Office Ilott v Mitson 2017 UKSC 17 Tenants Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003 (CCCFA) Gifts Partnership based work visa Anti-money laundering (AML) Lankow v Rose Trust Check Up Twelve years Will Trusts Trust Confidentiality Lump sum Family Protection Act 1955 Legislation update Trust busting Commercial Law Testamentary writing Immigration New Zealand Sale of Goods Compensation Offending White v White Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (FMCA) Eviction Interpretation Act 1999 Section 29 Reckless Trading Testamentary Promises Asset Protection Case Study Rest Home Subsidies Section 182 Family Proceedings Act 1980 Marriage Creating Trusts Auckland Office Due Diligence Interpretation of documents Recovery of money Family Trusts Character requirements Interest Financial Advisers Act 2008 Beneficiary Rights Limitation Act 2010 Abuse Erceg v Erceg Re Estate of Campbell Trustee Duties Consumer credit contracts Repayment Six years Fair share Skilled migrant points Domestic Violence Act 1995 Domestic violence Valid wills WINZ Physical abuse Protection Order Deceased's wishes Economic disadvantage Grey Power Duress Wills Zero Hour Contracts Amundson v Raos Visa application Gifting Interpretation Act 1999 Resident Visa Section 15 Contract Law Division of Functions Ministry of Social Development Protector Elder Law Personal Properties and Securities Act 1999

Archive