Reduced Limitation Periods Have Significant Consequences for Mortgagees

Thursday, September 07, 2017

 Read more

Residential-Care Subsidy Update - Eligibility Improved

Thursday, July 20, 2017

The High Court, in Broadbent v The Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development [2017] NZHC 1499 (a test case), has told the Ministry of Social Development that it is not correctly applying the means testing assessment for income when determining someone's eligibility for a residential-care subsidy. Read more

Commercial Leases - Things Landlords Should Consider Before Entering Into a New Lease

Friday, May 12, 2017

It is in a Landlord's best interest to protect their investment and make sure any exposure to loss from a dodgy Tenant is minimised.  All too often we hear of stories involving a Landlord being duped by a Tenant for whatever reason.  Perhaps the Tenant becomes unable to pay its rent and rather than seeking out the Landlord and dealing with the situation head on, the Tenant allows its financial problems to continue until it is too late.  By this time the Landlord is often owed money in rental and outgoings arrears and in the more extreme circumstances can be left with a vacant property needing to be re-tenanted urgently. Read more

Protecting Commercial Landlords From Tenancy Default

Friday, May 12, 2017

Unfortunately situations where Tenants are unable to pay rent on their leased commercial premises happens all too often.  As a commercial property Landlord, knowing your rights and what to do if this situation arises will help minimise your losses. Read more

House and Land Package Purchase Issues

Friday, May 12, 2017

Buying a new build "House and Land" package has become a popular option for many first home buyers.  It can involve a deposit lower than 20% of purchase price (depending on finance), and means you have the time it takes to build to keep saving towards the purchase of your new home. Read more

Are You in a De Facto Relationship?

Tuesday, May 02, 2017

It is common knowledge that when a married couple in New Zealand gets divorced, they, general speaking, get half each of all the property owned by the parties.  In New Zealand this asset division also extends to de facto relationships of more than three years, but what is a de facto relationship?  A marriage is easy to identify:  there is a wedding, someone cuts the cake, there is usually an adorable child in charge of the rings and most importantly, a legal document; a marriage certificate which says you are married.  However, de facto relationships are not so easy to identify. Read more

When Charity Does Not Begin at Home and Testamentary Freedom Triumphs

Tuesday, April 11, 2017

The truism that charity begins at home might have been given a serious knock back going by the recent UK Supreme Court decision concerning an adult daughter's claim against her mother's estate in IIott v Mitson [2017] UKSC 17.  Read more

Are You Getting Your Fair Share of Relationship Property Upon a Break Up?

Thursday, April 06, 2017

The Property (Relationships) Act 1976 ("the Act") applies to marriages, civil unions and de facto relationships.  Generally under the Act, at the end of one of these relationships, the parties receive a 50:50 share of all the relationship property.  This usually includes the home, family chattels, and all other property acquired during the relationship.  However the Court does have the power to award a lump sum payment or order the transfer of relationship property from one party in the relationship to the other under Section 15 of the Act. Read more

Will That Do? - Validation of Non-Compliant Wills

Tuesday, March 21, 2017

Before a deceased's last will can have the legal effect of distributing property to his or her heirs accordingly to its terms, it must be admitted to probate, that is accepted by the High Court as being valid. Read more

The New Draft Trusts Bill and its Suggested Disclosure Rules - How Could This Affect You?

Thursday, March 16, 2017

A new Trusts Bill has recently been released for public consultation.  This bill updates and changes various aspects of trust law.  One interesting proposed change is the rights beneficiaries have to trust information.  The most recent judicial case involving beneficiaries and trust information is Erceg v Erceg [2017] NZSC 28.  The Supreme Court did not find that there was a presumption for or against disclosure of trust documents, but that there is an "expectation that basic trust information will be disclosed to a close beneficiary who wants it".  The Supreme Court's analysis did differ from the lower Courts.  The Supreme Court listed certain factors to take into consideration when courts receive a request for disclosure.  They are: Read more

Recent Posts


Seperation Interest Residential Tamarapa v Byerley Body Corporate Recovery of money Constructive trusts Tenant Compensation Duress Protector Personal Lump sum Trust Check Up Commercial Property Re Estate of Feron Litigation Interpretation Act 1999 Charity Invalid wills Case Study Fair share Visa application Will that do SN v MN [2017] NZCA 289 Pattern of offending Violence Skilled migrant points Will Trust Confidentiality Ministry Work and Income Principal Clayton case Asset Protection Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 Limitation Act 1950 Financial services provider (FSP) Offending Mortgagee Blackwell v Hollings Partnership based work visa Mortgagor De facto Erceg v Erceg Shareholders' Agreement Charities Executors duty Acknowledgment of Debt Murrell v Hamilton Relationship Property Limitation Act 2010 Financial Advisers Act 2008 Trust busting Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (FMCA) Terms of Trade Estate Administration SMC Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003 (CCCFA) Civil union Document Disclosure Legislation update Property (Relationships) Act 1976 Character requirements Family Protection Act 1955 Interpretation of documents Section 15A Part payment Sale of Goods Ministry of Social Development Anti-money laundering (AML) Property Amundson v Raos Trustee Duties Family Trusts Wills Six years Hawkes Bay Trustee Company Limited v Judd Economic disadvantage Domestic Violence Act 1995 Creating Trusts Contract Law Rest Home Subsidies Lankow v Rose Trusts Bill Skilled migrant Verbal abuse Partner of resident Validity of Wills Wills Act 2007 Section 8 Limitation period Section 182 Family Proceedings Act 1980 Domestic violence Testamentary Promises ''Best Endeavours'' Lease Division of Functions Immigration New Zealand Break up Reckless Trading Testamentary freedom Administrators duty Protection Order Privacy Act 1993 Limitation defence Immigration Elder Law Health and Safety Reform Bill Deceased's wishes Tenants Commercial Law Abuse Testamentary capacity Subsidies KiwiSaver Companies Act 1993 Temper Claims against estates Company Law Lease Titles Psychological abuse Broadbent v Ministry of Social Development Gifting Zero Hour Contracts Testamentary writing Financial services Auckland Office Grey Power Wills Act 2007 Section 11 Charity begins at home Expression of interest Income Wilson v Donnellan Section 15 Trusts Employment Eviction Personal Properties and Securities Act 1999 Intellectual Property Landlord Twelve years Re Estate of Campbell Loss of income Albany Office Wills Act 2007 WINZ Resident Repayment Consumer credit contracts Acknowledgment Undue influence White v White Physical abuse Ilott v Mitson 2017 UKSC 17 Commercial Wills Act 2007 Section 14 Unfair contract terms Beneficiary Rights Living standards Valid wills Financial products Interpretation Act 1999 Section 29 Fair Trading Act 1986 Due Diligence Changes Directors' Duties Business Frustration Resident Visa Marriage Mortgage Gifts