Are You Getting Your Fair Share of Relationship Property Upon a Break Up?

Thursday, April 06, 2017

The Property (Relationships) Act 1976 ("the Act") applies to marriages, civil unions and de facto relationships.  Generally under the Act, at the end of one of these relationships, the parties receive a 50:50 share of all the relationship property.  This usually includes the home, family chattels, and all other property acquired during the relationship.  However the Court does have the power to award a lump sum payment or order the transfer of relationship property from one party in the relationship to the other under Section 15 of the Act. Read more

Are You Entitled To Value From Your (Soon-to-Be) Ex-Spouse's or Ex-Partner's Trust?

Monday, March 13, 2017

What happens if your relationship ends and your spouse/partner has previously settled property in a trust?  If the trust is valid, and there have been no dispositions to which the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 applies, there are two ways you may make a claim against that property. Read more

Recent Posts


Will Section 15 Valid wills Family Protection Act 1955 Pattern of offending Claims against estates Property Trusts Commercial Property Erceg v Erceg Interpretation Act 1999 Section 29 Expression of interest Fair share Business Hawkes Bay Trustee Company Limited v Judd Interpretation of documents Blackwell v Hollings Company Law Financial products Wills Employment Elder Law Division of Functions Wills Act 2007 Section 8 Testamentary capacity SN v MN [2017] NZCA 289 Will that do Break up Tenant Residential Compensation Interpretation Act 1999 Economic disadvantage Vessel surveyor Rest Home Subsidies Acknowledgment Anti-money laundering (AML) Gifts Financial services Partner of resident Body Corporate Section 15A Testamentary writing Personal Subsidies Beneficiary Rights Constructive trusts Limitation Act 2010 Privacy Act 1993 Deceased's wishes Visa application Clayton case Principal Living standards Civil union Eviction Skilled migrant points Auckland Office Resident Visa Ministry of Social Development Lump sum Family Trusts Wills Act 2007 De facto Grey Power Lease Titles Wilson v Donnellan Financial services provider (FSP) Limitation Act 1950 Frustration Legislation update Due Diligence Acknowledgment of Debt Trust Confidentiality Mortgagor Charities Lankow v Rose Recovery of money Shareholders' Agreement Commercial Intellectual Property Property (Relationships) Act 1976 Broadbent v Ministry of Social Development Limitation defence WINZ Physical abuse Vessel survey Tamarapa v Byerley Wills Act 2007 Section 11 Ship Fair Trading Act 1986 Re Estate of Feron Personal Properties and Securities Act 1999 Six years Verbal abuse Zero Hour Contracts Maritime Law Repayment Financial Advisers Act 2008 Part payment Landlord Gifting Seperation Protection Order Companies Act 1993 Trust busting Case Study Interest Duress Limitation period Offending Tenants Directors' Duties Immigration Mortgage Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 Skilled migrant Resident Administrators duty Invalid wills Marriage Domestic Violence Act 1995 Consumer credit contracts Vessel Sale and Purchase Testamentary freedom Amundson v Raos Trusts Bill Undue influence Document Disclosure Section 182 Family Proceedings Act 1980 Mortgagee Reckless Trading Psychological abuse Protector Health and Safety Reform Bill Ilott v Mitson 2017 UKSC 17 Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003 (CCCFA) Twelve years Unfair contract terms Commercial Law Re Estate of Campbell Ministry Violence Charity begins at home Relationship Property Partnership based work visa Albany Office Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (FMCA) Testamentary Promises Domestic violence Estate Administration Insurance Murrell v Hamilton Charity Sale of Goods Wills Act 2007 Section 14 Creating Trusts Lease ''Best Endeavours'' Immigration New Zealand Changes Trustee Duties Terms of Trade SMC Temper Asset Protection Trust Check Up Litigation KiwiSaver Loss of income Abuse Validity of Wills Income Work and Income Contract Law Character requirements White v White Executors duty