Are You Getting Your Fair Share of Relationship Property Upon a Break Up?

Thursday, April 06, 2017

The Property (Relationships) Act 1976 ("the Act") applies to marriages, civil unions and de facto relationships.  Generally under the Act, at the end of one of these relationships, the parties receive a 50:50 share of all the relationship property.  This usually includes the home, family chattels, and all other property acquired during the relationship.  However the Court does have the power to award a lump sum payment or order the transfer of relationship property from one party in the relationship to the other under Section 15 of the Act. Read more

Recent Posts


Personal Properties and Securities Act 1999 Case Study Commercial Property Undue influence Resident Trusts Vessel surveyor Vessel survey Pattern of offending Health and Safety Reform Bill Wills Act 2007 Section 11 Terms of Trade Ilott v Mitson 2017 UKSC 17 Relationship Property Frustration Protection Order Personal Ministry of Social Development Sale of Goods Family Protection Act 1955 Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003 (CCCFA) Work and Income Section 182 Family Proceedings Act 1980 Mortgagee Limitation Act 2010 Fair share Litigation Lump sum Subsidies Validity of Wills Testamentary writing Six years Changes Blackwell v Hollings Financial services provider (FSP) Partnership based work visa Interpretation of documents Valid wills Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (FMCA) Companies Act 1993 Charity begins at home Elder Law Part payment Commercial Immigration New Zealand Living standards Mortgage Domestic violence Company Law Marriage Landlord Testamentary Promises ''Best Endeavours'' Executors duty Expression of interest Wills Trusts Bill Contract Law Limitation Act 1950 Acknowledgment of Debt Skilled migrant points Invalid wills Civil union Employment Ministry Consumer credit contracts Character requirements Ship Registration Recovery of money Interest Mortgagor Due Diligence Business Administrators duty Hawkes Bay Trustee Company Limited v Judd Erceg v Erceg Anti-money laundering (AML) Unfair contract terms Intellectual Property Repayment Economic disadvantage Lankow v Rose Tamarapa v Byerley Testamentary freedom Asset Protection Tenant Grey Power Compensation Immigration Section 15A Loss of income Limitation period Wills Act 2007 Residential Limitation defence Trust busting Twelve years Trust Confidentiality Seperation Tenants Directors' Duties Gifts Property Domestic Violence Act 1995 Break up Income Division of Functions Commercial Law Amundson v Raos KiwiSaver Fair Trading Act 1986 Document Disclosure Vessel Sale and Purchase Financial products Estate Administration Physical abuse Ship Section 15 Creating Trusts Lease Violence Eviction Protector Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 Interpretation Act 1999 SN v MN [2017] NZCA 289 White v White Maritime Law Visa application Psychological abuse De facto Financial Advisers Act 2008 Privacy Act 1993 Financial services Broadbent v Ministry of Social Development Auckland Office Constructive trusts Skilled migrant Shareholders' Agreement Verbal abuse Clayton case Property (Relationships) Act 1976 Principal WINZ Wills Act 2007 Section 14 Ship's Mortgage Gifting Zero Hour Contracts Beneficiary Rights Interpretation Act 1999 Section 29 Abuse Trust Check Up Claims against estates Re Estate of Feron Will Deceased's wishes Charity Temper Offending Insurance Albany Office Acknowledgment Wills Act 2007 Section 8 Wilson v Donnellan Murrell v Hamilton Charities Maritime Lien Duress Re Estate of Campbell Resident Visa Lease Titles Rest Home Subsidies Family Trusts Partner of resident Reckless Trading Will that do SMC Body Corporate Testamentary capacity Legislation update Trustee Duties