Articles

Section 131: Duty of Directors to Act in Good Faith and in Best Interests of Company

Wednesday, September 20, 2017
In accordance with Section 131 of the Companies Act 1993 ("Act"), directors have a duty to act in good faith and in what they genuinely believe to be the best interests of the company.  While it may be expected that directors should always behave in such a manner, and not place their personal interests ahead of the company's, various judgments have explored the extent of this duty and provided more information about the considerations director should take account of when exercising their powers.

The Duty
As noted in the decision of Sojourner v Robb1, the duty is one of loyalty and arises out of the fiduciary relationship that directors owe to the company from their position as its agents.  Additionally, although a director must act in good faith and in the best interests of the company on most occasions, Section 131 of the Act outlines that there are a few exceptions to this duty which allow a director to act otherwise, as follows: Read more

Domestic Violence Case Law Update:

Thursday, September 07, 2017

 SN v MN [2017] NZCA 289  Read more

Section 135 of the Companies Act - Reckless Trading:

Tuesday, July 18, 2017

Non-Executive or Passive Directors and Directors' Duties: The Courts Take no Excuses for a "Hands Off" Approach Read more

Directors' Duties - What Directors Need to Know

Tuesday, July 18, 2017

In New Zealand, there are few prohibitions on who can become a director of a company, and no real qualification requirements.  This means that some people become directors without actually understanding what their role requires.  This can result in a company not being managed and governed as required by the Companies Act 1993 ("Act"), which in turn can lead to a breach of duty, which can have very serious consequences, up to and including personal liability for company debts or even criminal sanctions in the worst of cases. Read more

Company Law Case Summary: Mike Pero Mortgages Limited v Mike Pero [2016] NZHC 3185 per Katz J

Tuesday, July 18, 2017

Background Read more

Recent Posts


Tags

Limitation Act 1950 Financial services provider (FSP) Murrell v Hamilton Eviction Re Estate of Feron Changes Tenant Twelve years Testamentary Promises Six years Abuse De facto Verbal abuse Broadbent v Ministry of Social Development Mortgagee Pattern of offending Trust busting Lankow v Rose KiwiSaver Amundson v Raos Deceased's wishes Grey Power Estate Administration Offending Limitation Act 2010 ''Best Endeavours'' Acknowledgment of Debt Financial Advisers Act 2008 Reckless Trading Intellectual Property Administrators duty Interpretation of documents Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003 (CCCFA) Blackwell v Hollings Rest Home Subsidies Charity begins at home Immigration Resident Unfair contract terms Will Business Interpretation Act 1999 Section 29 Visa application Residential Gifting Break up Wills Act 2007 Legislation update Property Wills Lump sum Testamentary capacity Work and Income Trust Check Up Marriage Charities Beneficiary Rights Commercial Property Zero Hour Contracts Health and Safety Reform Bill Consumer credit contracts Due Diligence Elder Law Constructive trusts Duress Living standards Frustration Invalid wills Skilled migrant points Asset Protection Domestic violence Personal Properties and Securities Act 1999 Ministry of Social Development Undue influence Executors duty Landlord Fair Trading Act 1986 Case Study Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (FMCA) Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 Subsidies Skilled migrant White v White Sale of Goods Financial services Trusts Mortgage Document Disclosure Part payment Lease Lease Titles Compensation WINZ Trustee Duties Domestic Violence Act 1995 Relationship Property Testamentary writing Valid wills Acknowledgment Erceg v Erceg Wills Act 2007 Section 8 Recovery of money Mortgagor Ministry Financial products Civil union Section 15 Auckland Office Tenants Commercial Hawkes Bay Trustee Company Limited v Judd Family Protection Act 1955 Economic disadvantage Seperation Claims against estates Interpretation Act 1999 Section 15A Contract Law Physical abuse Principal Protection Order Income Ilott v Mitson 2017 UKSC 17 Division of Functions Testamentary freedom Temper Violence Albany Office Family Trusts Wilson v Donnellan Company Law Validity of Wills Loss of income Repayment Privacy Act 1993 Creating Trusts Directors' Duties Employment Will that do Trust Confidentiality Wills Act 2007 Section 14 Limitation period Protector Personal Terms of Trade Interest Section 182 Family Proceedings Act 1980 Body Corporate Psychological abuse Immigration New Zealand Re Estate of Campbell Property (Relationships) Act 1976 Charity Trusts Bill Litigation Expression of interest Limitation defence SN v MN [2017] NZCA 289 Commercial Law SMC Tamarapa v Byerley Gifts Wills Act 2007 Section 11 Fair share Companies Act 1993 Anti-money laundering (AML) Shareholders' Agreement Clayton case

Archive