Articles

Section 131: Duty of Directors to Act in Good Faith and in Best Interests of Company

Wednesday, September 20, 2017
In accordance with Section 131 of the Companies Act 1993 ("Act"), directors have a duty to act in good faith and in what they genuinely believe to be the best interests of the company.  While it may be expected that directors should always behave in such a manner, and not place their personal interests ahead of the company's, various judgments have explored the extent of this duty and provided more information about the considerations director should take account of when exercising their powers.

The Duty
As noted in the decision of Sojourner v Robb1, the duty is one of loyalty and arises out of the fiduciary relationship that directors owe to the company from their position as its agents.  Additionally, although a director must act in good faith and in the best interests of the company on most occasions, Section 131 of the Act outlines that there are a few exceptions to this duty which allow a director to act otherwise, as follows: Read more

Domestic Violence Case Law Update:

Thursday, September 07, 2017

 SN v MN [2017] NZCA 289  Read more

Section 135 of the Companies Act - Reckless Trading:

Tuesday, July 18, 2017

Non-Executive or Passive Directors and Directors' Duties: The Courts Take no Excuses for a "Hands Off" Approach Read more

Directors' Duties - What Directors Need to Know

Tuesday, July 18, 2017

In New Zealand, there are few prohibitions on who can become a director of a company, and no real qualification requirements.  This means that some people become directors without actually understanding what their role requires.  This can result in a company not being managed and governed as required by the Companies Act 1993 ("Act"), which in turn can lead to a breach of duty, which can have very serious consequences, up to and including personal liability for company debts or even criminal sanctions in the worst of cases. Read more

Company Law Case Summary: Mike Pero Mortgages Limited v Mike Pero [2016] NZHC 3185 per Katz J

Tuesday, July 18, 2017

Background Read more

Recent Posts


Tags

Family Trusts Recovery of money Beneficiary Rights Pattern of offending Amundson v Raos WINZ Twelve years Section 15 Principal Estate Administration Trust Check Up Claims against estates ''Best Endeavours'' Vessel Sale and Purchase Interest Reckless Trading Physical abuse Property Ilott v Mitson 2017 UKSC 17 Gifts SMC Lease Commercial Law Repayment Personal Deceased's wishes Residential Marriage Insurance Document Disclosure Administrators duty Blackwell v Hollings Hawkes Bay Trustee Company Limited v Judd Lump sum Maritime Law Terms of Trade Resident Visa Landlord Wills Act 2007 Section 14 Division of Functions Expression of interest Verbal abuse Limitation Act 2010 Trustee Duties Wills Act 2007 Section 11 Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003 (CCCFA) Trust busting Temper Financial services provider (FSP) Constructive trusts Due Diligence Limitation period Clayton case Duress Re Estate of Feron Rest Home Subsidies Grey Power Limitation Act 1950 Body Corporate Personal Properties and Securities Act 1999 Intellectual Property Wills Property (Relationships) Act 1976 Zero Hour Contracts Maritime Lien Ship Registration Executors duty Work and Income Charity Section 182 Family Proceedings Act 1980 Immigration Psychological abuse Consumer credit contracts Re Estate of Campbell Asset Protection Privacy Act 1993 Contract Law Relationship Property Companies Act 1993 Anti-money laundering (AML) Protection Order Will Tenants Family Protection Act 1955 Visa application Charity begins at home Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (FMCA) Case Study Creating Trusts Trusts Shareholders' Agreement Business Company Law Abuse Trusts Bill Protector Vessel surveyor Ship Interpretation of documents Litigation Financial products Frustration Partner of resident Wilson v Donnellan Murrell v Hamilton Fair share Commercial Property Ship's Mortgage KiwiSaver Will that do Section 15A Eviction Offending Subsidies Ministry of Social Development Seperation Mortgagor Partnership based work visa Wills Act 2007 Income Testamentary writing Civil union Vessel survey Broadbent v Ministry of Social Development Albany Office Six years Interpretation Act 1999 Tamarapa v Byerley Validity of Wills Testamentary capacity Unfair contract terms Health and Safety Reform Bill Skilled migrant Interpretation Act 1999 Section 29 Undue influence Testamentary Promises Lankow v Rose Employment Testamentary freedom Financial services Elder Law Trust Confidentiality Lease Titles Break up Living standards Valid wills Part payment Invalid wills Financial Advisers Act 2008 Skilled migrant points Mortgagee SN v MN [2017] NZCA 289 Compensation Directors' Duties Character requirements Violence Economic disadvantage De facto Auckland Office Sale of Goods Commercial Fair Trading Act 1986 Limitation defence Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 Resident Immigration New Zealand Ministry Wills Act 2007 Section 8 Domestic Violence Act 1995 Changes Erceg v Erceg Mortgage Domestic violence Acknowledgment Loss of income Charities Legislation update White v White Gifting Tenant Acknowledgment of Debt

Archive