Articles

Section 131: Duty of Directors to Act in Good Faith and in Best Interests of Company

Wednesday, September 20, 2017
In accordance with Section 131 of the Companies Act 1993 ("Act"), directors have a duty to act in good faith and in what they genuinely believe to be the best interests of the company.  While it may be expected that directors should always behave in such a manner, and not place their personal interests ahead of the company's, various judgments have explored the extent of this duty and provided more information about the considerations director should take account of when exercising their powers.

The Duty
As noted in the decision of Sojourner v Robb1, the duty is one of loyalty and arises out of the fiduciary relationship that directors owe to the company from their position as its agents.  Additionally, although a director must act in good faith and in the best interests of the company on most occasions, Section 131 of the Act outlines that there are a few exceptions to this duty which allow a director to act otherwise, as follows: Read more

Domestic Violence Case Law Update:

Thursday, September 07, 2017

 SN v MN [2017] NZCA 289  Read more

Section 135 of the Companies Act - Reckless Trading:

Tuesday, July 18, 2017

Non-Executive or Passive Directors and Directors' Duties: The Courts Take no Excuses for a "Hands Off" Approach Read more

Directors' Duties - What Directors Need to Know

Tuesday, July 18, 2017

In New Zealand, there are few prohibitions on who can become a director of a company, and no real qualification requirements.  This means that some people become directors without actually understanding what their role requires.  This can result in a company not being managed and governed as required by the Companies Act 1993 ("Act"), which in turn can lead to a breach of duty, which can have very serious consequences, up to and including personal liability for company debts or even criminal sanctions in the worst of cases. Read more

Company Law Case Summary: Mike Pero Mortgages Limited v Mike Pero [2016] NZHC 3185 per Katz J

Tuesday, July 18, 2017

Background Read more

Recent Posts


Tags

Company Law Zero Hour Contracts Validity of Wills Compensation Physical abuse Auckland Office Albany Office Family Protection Act 1955 Employment Intellectual Property Claims against estates Re Estate of Campbell Unfair contract terms Body Corporate Will that do Erceg v Erceg Landlord Trustee Duties Income Insurance Mortgage Pattern of offending Due Diligence Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 Lankow v Rose Immigration New Zealand Interpretation Act 1999 Frustration Broadbent v Ministry of Social Development Health and Safety Reform Bill Undue influence Tenants Amundson v Raos Beneficiary Rights Domestic Violence Act 1995 Ministry of Social Development Gifting Limitation defence Wills Act 2007 Section 14 Resident Mortgagor Protector Acknowledgment of Debt WINZ Personal Section 15A Murrell v Hamilton Interest Financial services Fair Trading Act 1986 Rest Home Subsidies Lump sum Partnership based work visa Creating Trusts Gifts Financial products Commercial Law Trust Check Up Limitation period Partner of resident Ship Registration Limitation Act 2010 Interpretation of documents Duress Estate Administration Ministry Civil union Verbal abuse Reckless Trading Break up Trusts Bill Vessel surveyor Vessel survey Principal Ilott v Mitson 2017 UKSC 17 Charity Temper De facto Psychological abuse Testamentary writing Property Skilled migrant Work and Income Re Estate of Feron Deceased's wishes Wills Act 2007 Contract Law Lease Section 182 Family Proceedings Act 1980 Vessel Sale and Purchase Trust Confidentiality Residential Six years Asset Protection Abuse Invalid wills Legislation update Wills Act 2007 Section 11 Commercial Property Testamentary capacity Division of Functions Fair share Financial Advisers Act 2008 Visa application Privacy Act 1993 KiwiSaver Charities Living standards Wills Repayment Immigration Subsidies Changes Acknowledgment Case Study Commercial Trust busting Offending Administrators duty Eviction Charity begins at home SMC Consumer credit contracts Maritime Lien Domestic violence Clayton case Lease Titles Directors' Duties Sale of Goods Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003 (CCCFA) Executors duty Interpretation Act 1999 Section 29 Resident Visa Wilson v Donnellan Financial services provider (FSP) Expression of interest Personal Properties and Securities Act 1999 Ship's Mortgage Mortgagee Limitation Act 1950 Litigation Twelve years Business Ship Document Disclosure Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (FMCA) Family Trusts Character requirements Terms of Trade Companies Act 1993 Marriage Anti-money laundering (AML) Grey Power Wills Act 2007 Section 8 Property (Relationships) Act 1976 Loss of income Testamentary Promises Recovery of money SN v MN [2017] NZCA 289 White v White Testamentary freedom Section 15 Part payment Economic disadvantage Blackwell v Hollings Constructive trusts Elder Law Tenant Shareholders' Agreement Trusts Seperation Will Maritime Law Tamarapa v Byerley Violence Valid wills Relationship Property Skilled migrant points ''Best Endeavours'' Protection Order Hawkes Bay Trustee Company Limited v Judd

Archive