Section 131: Duty of Directors to Act in Good Faith and in Best Interests of Company

Wednesday, September 20, 2017
In accordance with Section 131 of the Companies Act 1993 ("Act"), directors have a duty to act in good faith and in what they genuinely believe to be the best interests of the company.  While it may be expected that directors should always behave in such a manner, and not place their personal interests ahead of the company's, various judgments have explored the extent of this duty and provided more information about the considerations director should take account of when exercising their powers.

The Duty
As noted in the decision of Sojourner v Robb1, the duty is one of loyalty and arises out of the fiduciary relationship that directors owe to the company from their position as its agents.  Additionally, although a director must act in good faith and in the best interests of the company on most occasions, Section 131 of the Act outlines that there are a few exceptions to this duty which allow a director to act otherwise, as follows: Read more

Domestic Violence Case Law Update:

Thursday, September 07, 2017

 SN v MN [2017] NZCA 289  Read more

Reduced Limitation Periods Have Significant Consequences for Mortgagees

Thursday, September 07, 2017

 Read more

''Best Endeavours'' or ''All Reasonable Endeavours''

Monday, August 28, 2017

What's the Difference? Read more

Residential-Care Subsidy Update - Eligibility Improved

Thursday, July 20, 2017

The High Court, in Broadbent v The Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development [2017] NZHC 1499 (a test case), has told the Ministry of Social Development that it is not correctly applying the means testing assessment for income when determining someone's eligibility for a residential-care subsidy. Read more

Section 135 of the Companies Act - Reckless Trading:

Tuesday, July 18, 2017

Non-Executive or Passive Directors and Directors' Duties: The Courts Take no Excuses for a "Hands Off" Approach Read more

Directors' Duties - What Directors Need to Know

Tuesday, July 18, 2017

In New Zealand, there are few prohibitions on who can become a director of a company, and no real qualification requirements.  This means that some people become directors without actually understanding what their role requires.  This can result in a company not being managed and governed as required by the Companies Act 1993 ("Act"), which in turn can lead to a breach of duty, which can have very serious consequences, up to and including personal liability for company debts or even criminal sanctions in the worst of cases. Read more

Company Law Case Summary: Mike Pero Mortgages Limited v Mike Pero [2016] NZHC 3185 per Katz J

Tuesday, July 18, 2017

Background Read more

Terms of Trade - An Essential Part of Your Business

Thursday, June 01, 2017

Terms are Essential: Read more

Are You in a De Facto Relationship?

Tuesday, May 02, 2017

It is common knowledge that when a married couple in New Zealand gets divorced, they, general speaking, get half each of all the property owned by the parties.  In New Zealand this asset division also extends to de facto relationships of more than three years, but what is a de facto relationship?  A marriage is easy to identify:  there is a wedding, someone cuts the cake, there is usually an adorable child in charge of the rings and most importantly, a legal document; a marriage certificate which says you are married.  However, de facto relationships are not so easy to identify. Read more

Recent Posts


Charities Privacy Act 1993 Legislation update Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (FMCA) Claims against estates Immigration New Zealand Resident Fair share Violence Case Study Will Financial products Elder Law Changes Domestic Violence Act 1995 Wills Act 2007 Section 8 Trustee Duties Financial services Broadbent v Ministry of Social Development Sale of Goods Section 15A Intellectual Property Invalid wills Acknowledgment of Debt Partnership based work visa Ilott v Mitson 2017 UKSC 17 Protection Order Temper Deceased's wishes Auckland Office Psychological abuse Companies Act 1993 Mortgage Administrators duty Wills Act 2007 Health and Safety Reform Bill Asset Protection Estate Administration Blackwell v Hollings Personal Properties and Securities Act 1999 Lankow v Rose Limitation Act 2010 Company Law Partner of resident Interest Employment Executors duty Pattern of offending Mortgagee Limitation defence Section 15 Property (Relationships) Act 1976 Work and Income WINZ Constructive trusts Financial Advisers Act 2008 Interpretation Act 1999 Section 29 Lease Commercial Law Contract Law Relationship Property Financial services provider (FSP) Part payment ''Best Endeavours'' Division of Functions Anti-money laundering (AML) Principal Terms of Trade Offending Reckless Trading Wills Marriage Undue influence Clayton case Mortgagor Resident Visa Recovery of money Consumer credit contracts Acknowledgment Albany Office White v White Wills Act 2007 Section 14 Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003 (CCCFA) Landlord Hawkes Bay Trustee Company Limited v Judd Trusts Bill Ministry Testamentary capacity Compensation Charity begins at home Beneficiary Rights Trust busting Physical abuse Domestic violence KiwiSaver Visa application Gifting Eviction Interpretation Act 1999 SN v MN [2017] NZCA 289 Due Diligence Fair Trading Act 1986 Personal Economic disadvantage Valid wills Erceg v Erceg SMC Family Trusts Immigration Duress Repayment Living standards Expression of interest Business Wills Act 2007 Section 11 Document Disclosure Trusts Property Shareholders' Agreement Zero Hour Contracts Lump sum Skilled migrant points Body Corporate Commercial Property Civil union Family Protection Act 1955 Break up Charity Gifts Frustration Rest Home Subsidies Directors' Duties Tamarapa v Byerley Six years Income Creating Trusts Trust Check Up Testamentary freedom Lease Titles Testamentary writing Twelve years Protector Will that do Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 Ministry of Social Development Seperation Tenant Re Estate of Feron Interpretation of documents Amundson v Raos Skilled migrant Unfair contract terms Commercial Re Estate of Campbell De facto Validity of Wills Murrell v Hamilton Verbal abuse Abuse Wilson v Donnellan Testamentary Promises Tenants Subsidies Trust Confidentiality Litigation Section 182 Family Proceedings Act 1980 Limitation Act 1950 Loss of income Residential Grey Power Limitation period Character requirements