Are You Getting Your Fair Share of Relationship Property Upon a Break Up?

Thursday, April 06, 2017

The Property (Relationships) Act 1976 ("the Act") applies to marriages, civil unions and de facto relationships.  Generally under the Act, at the end of one of these relationships, the parties receive a 50:50 share of all the relationship property.  This usually includes the home, family chattels, and all other property acquired during the relationship.  However the Court does have the power to award a lump sum payment or order the transfer of relationship property from one party in the relationship to the other under Section 15 of the Act.

Section 15 applies when at the end of the relationship, the income and living standards of one party are likely to be significantly higher than the other party's because of the effects of the division of functions within the relationship while the parties were living together.

One of the most common situations where Section 15 can apply is when a wife has stayed at home to look after the children for 20 plus years, while the husband has been working and rising up the ranks in his job and acquiring experience in his profession.  When the parties separate, the husband usually has very high earning potential due to his accumulated work experience.  The wife, on the other hand, is usually limited in her employment options due to being out of the workforce for many years and is therefore likely to have significantly lower income and living standards compared to the husband once the parties split and divide the relationship property in half.  For example, one party gave up their career so the parties could have children and the other party could reach their full potential.

In such cases, the Courts have used Section 15 as a tool for compensation for the loss of income and living standards due to this division of functions.

Relationship property is a complicated issue and can also be an intense and emotional time for all parties involved.  If you have any questions about relationship property, want to know what your fair share is and what you can do about it, please contact Peter Fuscic on (09) 306 6746 ( from our Auckland City Office.


This article is published for general information purposes only.  Legal content in this article is necessarily of a general nature and should not be relied upon as legal advice.  If you require specific legal advice in respect of any legal issue, you should always engage a lawyer to provide that advice.   

Recent Posts


Limitation Act 2010 Abuse Relationship Property Limitation period Deceased's wishes Tamarapa v Byerley Testamentary freedom Family Trusts Family Protection Act 1955 Wills Act 2007 Section 14 Property (Relationships) Act 1976 Acknowledgment of Debt Living standards Trust Check Up Claims against estates Mortgagee Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (FMCA) Intellectual Property Reckless Trading Charity begins at home Mortgage Skilled migrant points Consumer credit contracts Personal Properties and Securities Act 1999 Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 Residential Interpretation Act 1999 Sale of Goods White v White Character requirements SN v MN [2017] NZCA 289 Charity Repayment Trusts Bill Grey Power Acknowledgment Health and Safety Reform Bill Civil union Lease Creating Trusts Undue influence Expression of interest Blackwell v Hollings Twelve years De facto Rest Home Subsidies Immigration Section 15A Constructive trusts Changes Interest Break up Wills Validity of Wills Skilled migrant Company Law Commercial Property Valid wills WINZ Subsidies Limitation Act 1950 Ministry of Social Development Trustee Duties Charities Erceg v Erceg Temper Albany Office Wilson v Donnellan Wills Act 2007 Section 8 Anti-money laundering (AML) Division of Functions Directors' Duties Section 182 Family Proceedings Act 1980 Commercial Principal Lump sum Estate Administration Protection Order Commercial Law Business ''Best Endeavours'' Re Estate of Feron Lease Titles Income Seperation Domestic Violence Act 1995 Wills Act 2007 Section 11 Testamentary capacity Unfair contract terms Terms of Trade Financial services provider (FSP) Gifting Mortgagor Frustration Trust Confidentiality Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003 (CCCFA) Psychological abuse Tenant Verbal abuse Limitation defence Ministry Privacy Act 1993 Economic disadvantage Loss of income Pattern of offending Domestic violence Landlord Administrators duty Asset Protection Testamentary writing Contract Law Compensation SMC Ilott v Mitson 2017 UKSC 17 Companies Act 1993 Will Document Disclosure Re Estate of Campbell Duress Immigration New Zealand Lankow v Rose Gifts Will that do Beneficiary Rights Partner of resident Financial services Resident Visa Broadbent v Ministry of Social Development Hawkes Bay Trustee Company Limited v Judd Due Diligence Fair Trading Act 1986 Partnership based work visa Section 15 Executors duty Resident Financial Advisers Act 2008 Marriage Property Fair share Interpretation Act 1999 Section 29 Trust busting Wills Act 2007 Litigation Work and Income Protector Violence Body Corporate Zero Hour Contracts Tenants Employment Clayton case Six years Part payment Elder Law Auckland Office Interpretation of documents Eviction Recovery of money Offending Shareholders' Agreement Testamentary Promises KiwiSaver Amundson v Raos Case Study Financial products Physical abuse Invalid wills Murrell v Hamilton Trusts Legislation update Visa application Personal