Articles

Are You Getting Your Fair Share of Relationship Property Upon a Break Up?

Thursday, April 06, 2017

The Property (Relationships) Act 1976 ("the Act") applies to marriages, civil unions and de facto relationships.  Generally under the Act, at the end of one of these relationships, the parties receive a 50:50 share of all the relationship property.  This usually includes the home, family chattels, and all other property acquired during the relationship.  However the Court does have the power to award a lump sum payment or order the transfer of relationship property from one party in the relationship to the other under Section 15 of the Act.

Section 15 applies when at the end of the relationship, the income and living standards of one party are likely to be significantly higher than the other party's because of the effects of the division of functions within the relationship while the parties were living together.

One of the most common situations where Section 15 can apply is when a wife has stayed at home to look after the children for 20 plus years, while the husband has been working and rising up the ranks in his job and acquiring experience in his profession.  When the parties separate, the husband usually has very high earning potential due to his accumulated work experience.  The wife, on the other hand, is usually limited in her employment options due to being out of the workforce for many years and is therefore likely to have significantly lower income and living standards compared to the husband once the parties split and divide the relationship property in half.  For example, one party gave up their career so the parties could have children and the other party could reach their full potential.

In such cases, the Courts have used Section 15 as a tool for compensation for the loss of income and living standards due to this division of functions.

Relationship property is a complicated issue and can also be an intense and emotional time for all parties involved.  If you have any questions about relationship property, want to know what your fair share is and what you can do about it, please contact Peter Fuscic on (09) 306 6746 (pfuscic@mcveaghfleming.co.nz) from our Auckland City Office.

 

This article is published for general information purposes only.  Legal content in this article is necessarily of a general nature and should not be relied upon as legal advice.  If you require specific legal advice in respect of any legal issue, you should always engage a lawyer to provide that advice.   

Recent Posts


Tags

Trust Confidentiality Civil union Wills Act 2007 Section 14 Due Diligence Violence Sale of Goods Financial services provider (FSP) Will that do Wills Act 2007 Section 11 Testamentary writing Executors duty Commercial Property Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 Compensation Shareholders' Agreement Interpretation of documents Acknowledgment Unfair contract terms Immigration Frustration Validity of Wills Amundson v Raos Health and Safety Reform Bill Mortgage Gifting Deceased's wishes Financial services Companies Act 1993 Personal Properties and Securities Act 1999 Creating Trusts Visa application Testamentary capacity Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003 (CCCFA) Fair Trading Act 1986 Mortgagee Gifts Tenant Consumer credit contracts Mortgagor Hawkes Bay Trustee Company Limited v Judd Income SN v MN [2017] NZCA 289 Broadbent v Ministry of Social Development Commercial Law Wilson v Donnellan Re Estate of Campbell ''Best Endeavours'' Charities Subsidies Undue influence Section 15 Family Protection Act 1955 Trust Check Up Fair share Testamentary freedom Terms of Trade Litigation Trusts Relationship Property KiwiSaver Reckless Trading Changes Expression of interest Partner of resident Property (Relationships) Act 1976 Pattern of offending Elder Law Financial products Skilled migrant points Will Domestic Violence Act 1995 Charity Personal Limitation Act 2010 Seperation Tamarapa v Byerley Lease Titles Verbal abuse Estate Administration Wills Act 2007 Section 8 Resident Visa Offending Psychological abuse Re Estate of Feron Commercial Lankow v Rose Family Trusts Privacy Act 1993 Repayment Landlord Zero Hour Contracts Abuse Acknowledgment of Debt Directors' Duties Skilled migrant Legislation update Protection Order Limitation period Asset Protection Murrell v Hamilton Protector Albany Office Contract Law Erceg v Erceg Anti-money laundering (AML) Interpretation Act 1999 Trusts Bill Eviction Financial Advisers Act 2008 Principal Resident Section 182 Family Proceedings Act 1980 Physical abuse Property Tenants Interest Charity begins at home Residential Ministry of Social Development Work and Income Character requirements Administrators duty Ministry Clayton case Trustee Duties Loss of income Division of Functions Lease Living standards Invalid wills White v White Beneficiary Rights Recovery of money Immigration New Zealand Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (FMCA) Valid wills De facto Twelve years Testamentary Promises Trust busting Domestic violence Ilott v Mitson 2017 UKSC 17 Break up Business Limitation Act 1950 Auckland Office Employment Case Study Wills Act 2007 Wills WINZ Duress Interpretation Act 1999 Section 29 Body Corporate Partnership based work visa Rest Home Subsidies Claims against estates Document Disclosure Company Law Temper Constructive trusts Grey Power Limitation defence Economic disadvantage Section 15A Lump sum Six years Part payment Intellectual Property SMC Marriage Blackwell v Hollings

Archive