Are You Entitled To Value From Your (Soon-to-Be) Ex-Spouse's or Ex-Partner's Trust?

Monday, March 13, 2017

What happens if your relationship ends and your spouse/partner has previously settled property in a trust?  If the trust is valid, and there have been no dispositions to which the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 applies, there are two ways you may make a claim against that property.

The first way is under Section 182 of the Family Proceedings Act 1980, which applies when there is a marriage.  This has received recent attention in the Supreme Court case of Clayton v Clayton [2016] NZSC 30.  The second, most recent and developing way, is to make the claim of a constructive trust over property of the express trust.  There does not necessarily need to be a marriage for a constructive trust claim to be made.

Section 182 allows for the Court to resettle/redistribute a trust if it is a "nuptial settlement" to reflect the expectations of the parties.  This section was based on the former common practice of a trust being set up for the husband and wife, but after a divorce, the trustees (who are usually the husband and others) would refuse to distribute any trust property to the ex-wife.  Clayton v Clayton appears to have extended the concept of such nuptial settlements to include trusts which reference any spouse of a partner who is a named beneficiary, even if the reference is general (ie, does not say "Jane Smith" is a beneficiary but says "a spouse of John Smith" is a beneficiary).

The Court can take property out of the trust and resettle it to ensure that expectations are met.  Common practice is to create two new trusts, one for the husband and one for the wife.  In Clayton v Clayton, the Court suggested that the proper way to analyse expectations is to analyse what a spouse may have received during the life of the trust, not what they may have expected to receive during the course of the (now ended) marriage.

The modern genesis of the constructive trust argument is from Lankow v Rose [1995] 1 NZLR 277 (CA).  A constructive trust entitles you to the part of the property that is subject to the constructive trust.  Lankow v Rose requires that there be a direct or indirect contribution to the property, that the claimant expected an interest in the property, that such expectation was reasonable and that the owner of the property should reasonably be expected to give the interest.

Under Murrell v Hamilton [2014] NZCA 377, it is possible to impose a constructive trust over the assets of an express trust if there is only one trustee and the Lankow v Rose factors are present, or if the other trustees have delegated/abdicated their control to one trustee and the Lankow v Rose factors are present.

In the recent case of Hawke's Bay Trustee Company Ltd v Judd [2016] NZCA 397 an ex-wife was awarded $65,000.00 in trust property, despite the value of the property actually decreasing during the marriage.  She had worked 20-40 hours a week on the garden and housekeeping, and the corporate trustee had delegated its decision making power to the husband.  The Court declined the appeal and the judgment of the High Court that awarded the wife $65,000.00 under Lankow v Rose was upheld.

While you may have rights under the Property (Relationships) Act 1976, there are other avenues.  With the great number of trusts in New Zealand, it is important to know your rights and what you are entitled to.  If you have any questions about trusts or relationship property, feel free to contact Peter Fuscic on (09) 306 6746 ( from our Auckland City Office.


This article is published for general information purposes only.  Legal content in this article is necessarily of a general nature and should not be relied upon as legal advice.  If you require specific legal advice in respect of any legal issue, you should always engage a lawyer to provide that advice.   

Recent Posts


Part payment Family Protection Act 1955 Landlord Loss of income Civil union Trusts Interpretation Act 1999 Directors' Duties Abuse Contract Law Verbal abuse Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 Limitation Act 1950 Domestic violence Ministry Company Law Wilson v Donnellan Resident Rest Home Subsidies Testamentary Promises Shareholders' Agreement Terms of Trade Income Character requirements Hawkes Bay Trustee Company Limited v Judd Residential De facto Immigration New Zealand Acknowledgment Expression of interest Beneficiary Rights Body Corporate Tenant Executors duty Vessel survey Companies Act 1993 Anti-money laundering (AML) Health and Safety Reform Bill Tenants Work and Income Clayton case Amundson v Raos Insurance Charities Trust Confidentiality Immigration Section 15A Wills Act 2007 Section 8 Acknowledgment of Debt Blackwell v Hollings Business Document Disclosure Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (FMCA) Vessel surveyor Property (Relationships) Act 1976 Grey Power Six years Trusts Bill SN v MN [2017] NZCA 289 Financial services Maritime Law Division of Functions Wills Act 2007 Fair share Estate Administration Seperation Wills Act 2007 Section 14 Wills Act 2007 Section 11 Mortgage Compensation Limitation period Intellectual Property Mortgagor Due Diligence Limitation Act 2010 Validity of Wills Family Trusts Lankow v Rose Ilott v Mitson 2017 UKSC 17 Legislation update Protection Order Commercial Constructive trusts Privacy Act 1993 Albany Office KiwiSaver Financial Advisers Act 2008 Employment Erceg v Erceg Wills Lease Section 15 Twelve years Skilled migrant points Undue influence Fair Trading Act 1986 Lump sum Trust Check Up Economic disadvantage Repayment WINZ Psychological abuse Protector Invalid wills Unfair contract terms Relationship Property Duress Elder Law Broadbent v Ministry of Social Development Valid wills Will that do Trust busting Asset Protection Administrators duty Gifting Testamentary freedom Interest Changes Frustration Ministry of Social Development ''Best Endeavours'' Claims against estates Gifts Principal Vessel Sale and Purchase Auckland Office Will Zero Hour Contracts Testamentary capacity Charity begins at home Eviction Pattern of offending Personal Partner of resident Trustee Duties Interpretation of documents Commercial Law Mortgagee Offending Marriage Financial products Physical abuse Resident Visa White v White Litigation Subsidies Personal Properties and Securities Act 1999 Interpretation Act 1999 Section 29 Consumer credit contracts Financial services provider (FSP) Recovery of money Section 182 Family Proceedings Act 1980 Murrell v Hamilton Deceased's wishes Re Estate of Feron Skilled migrant Re Estate of Campbell Case Study Charity Reckless Trading Break up Testamentary writing Sale of Goods Tamarapa v Byerley Living standards Property Partnership based work visa Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003 (CCCFA) Lease Titles Ship Temper Commercial Property Creating Trusts Violence Visa application Limitation defence Domestic Violence Act 1995 SMC