Articles

Are You Entitled To Value From Your (Soon-to-Be) Ex-Spouse's or Ex-Partner's Trust?

Monday, March 13, 2017

What happens if your relationship ends and your spouse/partner has previously settled property in a trust?  If the trust is valid, and there have been no dispositions to which the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 applies, there are two ways you may make a claim against that property.

The first way is under Section 182 of the Family Proceedings Act 1980, which applies when there is a marriage.  This has received recent attention in the Supreme Court case of Clayton v Clayton [2016] NZSC 30.  The second, most recent and developing way, is to make the claim of a constructive trust over property of the express trust.  There does not necessarily need to be a marriage for a constructive trust claim to be made.

Section 182 allows for the Court to resettle/redistribute a trust if it is a "nuptial settlement" to reflect the expectations of the parties.  This section was based on the former common practice of a trust being set up for the husband and wife, but after a divorce, the trustees (who are usually the husband and others) would refuse to distribute any trust property to the ex-wife.  Clayton v Clayton appears to have extended the concept of such nuptial settlements to include trusts which reference any spouse of a partner who is a named beneficiary, even if the reference is general (ie, does not say "Jane Smith" is a beneficiary but says "a spouse of John Smith" is a beneficiary).

The Court can take property out of the trust and resettle it to ensure that expectations are met.  Common practice is to create two new trusts, one for the husband and one for the wife.  In Clayton v Clayton, the Court suggested that the proper way to analyse expectations is to analyse what a spouse may have received during the life of the trust, not what they may have expected to receive during the course of the (now ended) marriage.

The modern genesis of the constructive trust argument is from Lankow v Rose [1995] 1 NZLR 277 (CA).  A constructive trust entitles you to the part of the property that is subject to the constructive trust.  Lankow v Rose requires that there be a direct or indirect contribution to the property, that the claimant expected an interest in the property, that such expectation was reasonable and that the owner of the property should reasonably be expected to give the interest.

Under Murrell v Hamilton [2014] NZCA 377, it is possible to impose a constructive trust over the assets of an express trust if there is only one trustee and the Lankow v Rose factors are present, or if the other trustees have delegated/abdicated their control to one trustee and the Lankow v Rose factors are present.

In the recent case of Hawke's Bay Trustee Company Ltd v Judd [2016] NZCA 397 an ex-wife was awarded $65,000.00 in trust property, despite the value of the property actually decreasing during the marriage.  She had worked 20-40 hours a week on the garden and housekeeping, and the corporate trustee had delegated its decision making power to the husband.  The Court declined the appeal and the judgment of the High Court that awarded the wife $65,000.00 under Lankow v Rose was upheld.

While you may have rights under the Property (Relationships) Act 1976, there are other avenues.  With the great number of trusts in New Zealand, it is important to know your rights and what you are entitled to.  If you have any questions about trusts or relationship property, feel free to contact Peter Fuscic on (09) 306 6746 (pfuscic@mcveaghfleming.co.nz) from our Auckland City Office.

 

This article is published for general information purposes only.  Legal content in this article is necessarily of a general nature and should not be relied upon as legal advice.  If you require specific legal advice in respect of any legal issue, you should always engage a lawyer to provide that advice.   

Recent Posts


Tags

Division of Functions Hawkes Bay Trustee Company Limited v Judd Violence Trust busting Offending Constructive trusts Unfair contract terms Limitation period Beneficiary Rights Pattern of offending Protection Order Resident Contract Law Civil union Character requirements Part payment Wills Act 2007 Section 11 Gifts Broadbent v Ministry of Social Development Estate Administration WINZ Interest Landlord ''Best Endeavours'' SMC Mortgagee Health and Safety Reform Bill Executors duty Resident Visa Limitation Act 1950 Wills Personal Amundson v Raos Albany Office Ministry of Social Development Protector Expression of interest Privacy Act 1993 Acknowledgment Charities Relationship Property Terms of Trade KiwiSaver SN v MN [2017] NZCA 289 Property Break up Due Diligence Grey Power Interpretation Act 1999 Section 29 Income Personal Properties and Securities Act 1999 Interpretation Act 1999 Erceg v Erceg Limitation defence Verbal abuse Skilled migrant Testamentary Promises Recovery of money Intellectual Property Ministry White v White Duress Directors' Duties Immigration Testamentary writing Sale of Goods Seperation Document Disclosure Consumer credit contracts Trusts Bill Family Protection Act 1955 Case Study Re Estate of Campbell Employment Commercial Property Will that do Partnership based work visa Valid wills Immigration New Zealand Ilott v Mitson 2017 UKSC 17 Auckland Office Living standards Commercial Domestic violence Fair Trading Act 1986 Fair share Deceased's wishes Physical abuse Mortgage Blackwell v Hollings Subsidies Trust Confidentiality Charity begins at home Companies Act 1993 Interpretation of documents Compensation Commercial Law Litigation Shareholders' Agreement Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (FMCA) Eviction Clayton case Six years Creating Trusts Twelve years Frustration Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 Loss of income Testamentary freedom Wills Act 2007 Financial Advisers Act 2008 Reckless Trading Section 15A Lump sum Legislation update Rest Home Subsidies Tenants Property (Relationships) Act 1976 Business Tamarapa v Byerley Partner of resident Wills Act 2007 Section 8 Company Law Administrators duty Financial services Elder Law Trust Check Up Skilled migrant points Body Corporate Financial services provider (FSP) Principal Marriage Repayment Lease Murrell v Hamilton Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003 (CCCFA) Psychological abuse Validity of Wills Asset Protection Undue influence Economic disadvantage Mortgagor Section 15 Trusts Lankow v Rose Visa application Wills Act 2007 Section 14 Invalid wills Financial products Testamentary capacity Changes Residential Re Estate of Feron Gifting Claims against estates Anti-money laundering (AML) Charity Wilson v Donnellan Will Zero Hour Contracts Family Trusts Trustee Duties De facto Temper Work and Income Section 182 Family Proceedings Act 1980 Tenant Domestic Violence Act 1995 Abuse Acknowledgment of Debt Limitation Act 2010 Lease Titles

Archive