Are You in a De Facto Relationship?

Tuesday, May 02, 2017

It is common knowledge that when a married couple in New Zealand gets divorced, they, general speaking, get half each of all the property owned by the parties.  In New Zealand this asset division also extends to de facto relationships of more than three years, but what is a de facto relationship?  A marriage is easy to identify:  there is a wedding, someone cuts the cake, there is usually an adorable child in charge of the rings and most importantly, a legal document; a marriage certificate which says you are married.  However, de facto relationships are not so easy to identify. Read more

When Charity Does Not Begin at Home and Testamentary Freedom Triumphs

Tuesday, April 11, 2017

The truism that charity begins at home might have been given a serious knock back going by the recent UK Supreme Court decision concerning an adult daughter's claim against her mother's estate in IIott v Mitson [2017] UKSC 17.  Read more

Are You Getting Your Fair Share of Relationship Property Upon a Break Up?

Thursday, April 06, 2017

The Property (Relationships) Act 1976 ("the Act") applies to marriages, civil unions and de facto relationships.  Generally under the Act, at the end of one of these relationships, the parties receive a 50:50 share of all the relationship property.  This usually includes the home, family chattels, and all other property acquired during the relationship.  However the Court does have the power to award a lump sum payment or order the transfer of relationship property from one party in the relationship to the other under Section 15 of the Act. Read more

Recent Posts


Testamentary capacity Wills Act 2007 Section 11 Eviction Fair Trading Act 1986 Gifts Relationship Property Murrell v Hamilton Re Estate of Campbell Seperation Skilled migrant Erceg v Erceg Living standards Re Estate of Feron Interpretation Act 1999 Section 29 Trusts Valid wills SMC Property (Relationships) Act 1976 Due Diligence Validity of Wills Document Disclosure Case Study Work and Income Clayton case Family Protection Act 1955 Lump sum Executors duty Lease Albany Office Wills Act 2007 Section 8 Will White v White Personal Directors' Duties Gifting Intellectual Property Charities Financial products Trust busting Charity Employment Visa application Compensation Legislation update Tenants Family Trusts Anti-money laundering (AML) Property Subsidies Terms of Trade Claims against estates Trusts Bill Ministry Beneficiary Rights Duress Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003 (CCCFA) Constructive trusts Trust Check Up Reckless Trading Elder Law Personal Properties and Securities Act 1999 Section 182 Family Proceedings Act 1980 Consumer credit contracts WINZ Financial Advisers Act 2008 Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 Landlord Ilott v Mitson 2017 UKSC 17 Company Law Zero Hour Contracts Wills Act 2007 Section 14 Hawkes Bay Trustee Company Limited v Judd Business Immigration Economic disadvantage Expression of interest Health and Safety Reform Bill Income Invalid wills Rest Home Subsidies Companies Act 1993 Auckland Office Financial services provider (FSP) Fair share Estate Administration Undue influence Grey Power KiwiSaver Body Corporate Charity begins at home Conract Law Tenant Trustee Duties Lease Titles Skilled migrant points Creating Trusts Lankow v Rose Commercial Property Testamentary freedom Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (FMCA) Commercial Unfair contract terms Asset Protection Tamarapa v Byerley Testamentary Promises Wills Resident Civil union Loss of income Residential Section 15A Blackwell v Hollings Testamentary writing Commercial Law Break up Wills Act 2007 Trust Confidentiality Broadbent v Ministry of Social Development Shareholders' Agreement Deceased's wishes Immigration New Zealand Amundson v Raos Interpretation of documents Administrators duty Litigation Division of Functions Financial services Sale of Goods De facto Section 15 Privacy Act 1993 Wilson v Donnellan Changes Interpretation Act 1999 Will that do Marriage Ministry of Social Development