Articles

Residential-Care Subsidy Update - Eligibility Improved

Thursday, July 20, 2017

The High Court, in Broadbent v The Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development [2017] NZHC 1499 (a test case), has told the Ministry of Social Development that it is not correctly applying the means testing assessment for income when determining someone's eligibility for a residential-care subsidy. Read more

The New Draft Trusts Bill and its Suggested Disclosure Rules - How Could This Affect You?

Thursday, March 16, 2017

A new Trusts Bill has recently been released for public consultation.  This bill updates and changes various aspects of trust law.  One interesting proposed change is the rights beneficiaries have to trust information.  The most recent judicial case involving beneficiaries and trust information is Erceg v Erceg [2017] NZSC 28.  The Supreme Court did not find that there was a presumption for or against disclosure of trust documents, but that there is an "expectation that basic trust information will be disclosed to a close beneficiary who wants it".  The Supreme Court's analysis did differ from the lower Courts.  The Supreme Court listed certain factors to take into consideration when courts receive a request for disclosure.  They are: Read more

Are You Entitled To Value From Your (Soon-to-Be) Ex-Spouse's or Ex-Partner's Trust?

Monday, March 13, 2017

What happens if your relationship ends and your spouse/partner has previously settled property in a trust?  If the trust is valid, and there have been no dispositions to which the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 applies, there are two ways you may make a claim against that property. Read more

Family Trusts May Have to Get an IRD Number Even if the Trust Earns No Income

Matthew Tetley-Jones

Tuesday, July 14, 2015

Family Trusts May Have to Get an IRD Number Even if the Trust Earns No Income Read more

Effective Trust Management and Asset Protection

Tuesday, July 15, 2014

"Trust busting" is the term given to an attempt made to penetrate a Trust structure and have assets held by the Trust declared by the Courts to be owned personally by an individual. The implication of Trust assets being found to be owned personally is that these assets then become part of an individual's net worth and are an available "property pool" to former spouses/partners or creditors with valid claims against the individual.  Read more

Recent Posts


Tags

Limitation period Re Estate of Feron Case Study Lease Property Landlord Civil union Terms of Trade Murrell v Hamilton Section 15A Partnership based work visa Immigration New Zealand Litigation Acknowledgment of Debt SMC Section 182 Family Proceedings Act 1980 Vessel Sale and Purchase Family Protection Act 1955 Limitation Act 2010 Financial Advisers Act 2008 Expression of interest Insurance Grey Power Trust Check Up Contract Law Part payment Testamentary freedom Character requirements Mortgagee Loss of income Administrators duty Mortgage Claims against estates Wills Act 2007 Section 8 Business Wills Act 2007 Section 14 Interpretation of documents Lankow v Rose Trustee Duties Re Estate of Campbell Visa application Shareholders' Agreement Executors duty Charity Directors' Duties Pattern of offending Beneficiary Rights Health and Safety Reform Bill ''Best Endeavours'' Frustration Resident Visa Testamentary writing Document Disclosure Will Seperation KiwiSaver Commercial Law Due Diligence Valid wills Deceased's wishes Will that do Ministry of Social Development Six years Financial products Trust Confidentiality Relationship Property Interest Changes Lump sum Tamarapa v Byerley Interpretation Act 1999 Offending Consumer credit contracts Blackwell v Hollings Repayment Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 Verbal abuse Break up Resident Commercial Estate Administration Limitation Act 1950 Financial services provider (FSP) Gifts Recovery of money Subsidies Charities Vessel surveyor Marriage Privacy Act 1993 Employment Domestic violence Hawkes Bay Trustee Company Limited v Judd Charity begins at home Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (FMCA) Compensation De facto Vessel survey Trusts Fair share Division of Functions Albany Office Auckland Office Invalid wills Maritime Law Erceg v Erceg Wills Act 2007 Section 11 Anti-money laundering (AML) Rest Home Subsidies SN v MN [2017] NZCA 289 Work and Income Interpretation Act 1999 Section 29 Physical abuse Zero Hour Contracts Tenants Testamentary capacity WINZ Personal Reckless Trading Unfair contract terms Wills Act 2007 Asset Protection Financial services Fair Trading Act 1986 Ministry Trusts Bill Section 15 Immigration Duress Elder Law Twelve years Clayton case Family Trusts Eviction Ship Economic disadvantage Mortgagor Wills Validity of Wills Acknowledgment Residential Broadbent v Ministry of Social Development Personal Properties and Securities Act 1999 Ilott v Mitson 2017 UKSC 17 Sale of Goods Protector Tenant Principal Skilled migrant points Companies Act 1993 Temper Domestic Violence Act 1995 Creating Trusts Body Corporate Violence Property (Relationships) Act 1976 Company Law Psychological abuse Lease Titles Gifting White v White Testamentary Promises Skilled migrant Constructive trusts Abuse Undue influence Amundson v Raos Commercial Property Intellectual Property Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003 (CCCFA) Income Legislation update Partner of resident Living standards Protection Order Limitation defence Wilson v Donnellan Trust busting

Archive