The New Draft Trusts Bill and its Suggested Disclosure Rules - How Could This Affect You?

Thursday, March 16, 2017

A new Trusts Bill has recently been released for public consultation.  This bill updates and changes various aspects of trust law.  One interesting proposed change is the rights beneficiaries have to trust information.  The most recent judicial case involving beneficiaries and trust information is Erceg v Erceg [2017] NZSC 28.  The Supreme Court did not find that there was a presumption for or against disclosure of trust documents, but that there is an "expectation that basic trust information will be disclosed to a close beneficiary who wants it".  The Supreme Court's analysis did differ from the lower Courts.  The Supreme Court listed certain factors to take into consideration when courts receive a request for disclosure.  They are: Read more

Are You Entitled To Value From Your (Soon-to-Be) Ex-Spouse's or Ex-Partner's Trust?

Monday, March 13, 2017

What happens if your relationship ends and your spouse/partner has previously settled property in a trust?  If the trust is valid, and there have been no dispositions to which the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 applies, there are two ways you may make a claim against that property. Read more

Family Trusts May Have to Get an IRD Number Even if the Trust Earns No Income

Matthew Tetley-Jones

Tuesday, July 14, 2015

Family Trusts May Have to Get an IRD Number Even if the Trust Earns No Income Read more

Effective Trust Management and Asset Protection

Tuesday, July 15, 2014

"Trust busting" is the term given to an attempt made to penetrate a Trust structure and have assets held by the Trust declared by the Courts to be owned personally by an individual. The implication of Trust assets being found to be owned personally is that these assets then become part of an individual's net worth and are an available "property pool" to former spouses/partners or creditors with valid claims against the individual.  Read more

Recent Posts


Charities Consumer credit contracts Employment Interpretation of documents Erceg v Erceg Fair share Will Charity begins at home Re Estate of Campbell Wills Civil union Wilson v Donnellan Testamentary capacity Financial services provider (FSP) Compensation Personal Trust Confidentiality Conract Law Claims against estates Due Diligence Fair Trading Act 1986 Business Lease Titles Trust busting Property (Relationships) Act 1976 Clayton case Immigration Testamentary writing Undue influence Section 15A Changes Wills Act 2007 Section 11 Trusts Bill Anti-money laundering (AML) Duress Trustee Duties Eviction Body Corporate Health and Safety Reform Bill Constructive trusts Financial products Amundson v Raos Trusts Creating Trusts Marriage Loss of income Testamentary freedom Break up Commercial Law Testamentary Promises Seperation Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (FMCA) Lease Blackwell v Hollings Living standards Valid wills Trust Check Up Validity of Wills Beneficiary Rights Wills Act 2007 Re Estate of Feron Family Trusts Unfair contract terms Ilott v Mitson 2017 UKSC 17 Tenants Auckland Office Asset Protection Financial Advisers Act 2008 Invalid wills Interpretation Act 1999 Executors duty White v White Hawkes Bay Trustee Company Limited v Judd Lankow v Rose Murrell v Hamilton Lump sum Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003 (CCCFA) Deceased's wishes Intellectual Property Administrators duty Wills Act 2007 Section 8 Litigation Zero Hour Contracts Section 15 Charity Albany Office Commercial Property KiwiSaver Wills Act 2007 Section 14 Estate Administration Economic disadvantage Section 182 Family Proceedings Act 1980 Will that do Tamarapa v Byerley Residential De facto Division of Functions Interpretation Act 1999 Section 29 Relationship Property Family Protection Act 1955 Income Property Financial services Legislation update Document Disclosure