Articles

Residential-Care Subsidy Update - Eligibility Improved

Thursday, July 20, 2017

The High Court, in Broadbent v The Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development [2017] NZHC 1499 (a test case), has told the Ministry of Social Development that it is not correctly applying the means testing assessment for income when determining someone's eligibility for a residential-care subsidy. Read more

The New Draft Trusts Bill and its Suggested Disclosure Rules - How Could This Affect You?

Thursday, March 16, 2017

A new Trusts Bill has recently been released for public consultation.  This bill updates and changes various aspects of trust law.  One interesting proposed change is the rights beneficiaries have to trust information.  The most recent judicial case involving beneficiaries and trust information is Erceg v Erceg [2017] NZSC 28.  The Supreme Court did not find that there was a presumption for or against disclosure of trust documents, but that there is an "expectation that basic trust information will be disclosed to a close beneficiary who wants it".  The Supreme Court's analysis did differ from the lower Courts.  The Supreme Court listed certain factors to take into consideration when courts receive a request for disclosure.  They are: Read more

Are You Entitled To Value From Your (Soon-to-Be) Ex-Spouse's or Ex-Partner's Trust?

Monday, March 13, 2017

What happens if your relationship ends and your spouse/partner has previously settled property in a trust?  If the trust is valid, and there have been no dispositions to which the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 applies, there are two ways you may make a claim against that property. Read more

Family Trusts May Have to Get an IRD Number Even if the Trust Earns No Income

Matthew Tetley-Jones

Tuesday, July 14, 2015

Family Trusts May Have to Get an IRD Number Even if the Trust Earns No Income Read more

Effective Trust Management and Asset Protection

Tuesday, July 15, 2014

"Trust busting" is the term given to an attempt made to penetrate a Trust structure and have assets held by the Trust declared by the Courts to be owned personally by an individual. The implication of Trust assets being found to be owned personally is that these assets then become part of an individual's net worth and are an available "property pool" to former spouses/partners or creditors with valid claims against the individual.  Read more

Recent Posts


Tags

Interpretation Act 1999 Albany Office Wills Privacy Act 1993 Offending White v White Financial Advisers Act 2008 Wills Act 2007 Section 11 Partner of resident Resident Protection Order Principal Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003 (CCCFA) Lump sum Residential Validity of Wills Income Wilson v Donnellan Constructive trusts Commercial Law Due Diligence Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (FMCA) Hawkes Bay Trustee Company Limited v Judd Amundson v Raos Mortgage Financial services provider (FSP) Administrators duty Skilled migrant Interpretation of documents Domestic violence Creating Trusts Protector Temper Anti-money laundering (AML) Immigration New Zealand Wills Act 2007 Business Deceased's wishes Asset Protection Lease Claims against estates Section 15A Trusts Bill Limitation Act 2010 Property (Relationships) Act 1976 Eviction Auckland Office Break up Personal Commercial Fair Trading Act 1986 Subsidies Skilled migrant points Gifting Landlord Visa application WINZ Murrell v Hamilton De facto Mortgagee Section 15 Elder Law Contract Law Limitation period Financial products Loss of income Charities Relationship Property Gifts Re Estate of Campbell Interest Document Disclosure Rest Home Subsidies Limitation Act 1950 Domestic Violence Act 1995 Repayment Twelve years Reckless Trading Sale of Goods Unfair contract terms Undue influence Health and Safety Reform Bill Trust Confidentiality Zero Hour Contracts Will Company Law Fair share SMC Terms of Trade Division of Functions Intellectual Property Employment Character requirements Acknowledgment of Debt Economic disadvantage KiwiSaver Tenants Financial services Living standards ''Best Endeavours'' Physical abuse Shareholders' Agreement Valid wills Companies Act 1993 Beneficiary Rights Ministry of Social Development Work and Income Grey Power Marriage Trust Check Up Estate Administration Changes Psychological abuse Testamentary writing Case Study Frustration Family Protection Act 1955 Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 Pattern of offending Trusts Acknowledgment Litigation Wills Act 2007 Section 8 Seperation Verbal abuse Partnership based work visa Civil union Commercial Property Legislation update Part payment Charity begins at home Charity Testamentary capacity Ilott v Mitson 2017 UKSC 17 Recovery of money Broadbent v Ministry of Social Development Trust busting Clayton case Tenant Duress Mortgagor Limitation defence Re Estate of Feron Invalid wills Resident Visa Tamarapa v Byerley Lease Titles Will that do Consumer credit contracts Interpretation Act 1999 Section 29 SN v MN [2017] NZCA 289 Section 182 Family Proceedings Act 1980 Trustee Duties Wills Act 2007 Section 14 Testamentary Promises Family Trusts Blackwell v Hollings Immigration Personal Properties and Securities Act 1999 Directors' Duties Ministry Expression of interest Body Corporate Executors duty Violence Compensation Lankow v Rose Property Abuse Six years Erceg v Erceg Testamentary freedom

Archive